More efficient manufacturing, falling battery costs and intense competition are lowering sticker prices for battery-powered models to within striking distance of gasoline cars.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Can you list actual models and prices to back your claim because it seems like most people are bitching about the high prices of EVs.

    I’m a BEV advocate, but even this is an easy one. In 2022 a Tesla Model 3 LR cost $52k while you can get the exact same car new today for $47k. This is even just MSRP. That $47k car is even $7500 cheaper for most people.

    Tesla Model Y LR from the same year, 2022, is even more dramatic. It was $67k and now costs $49k.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      I don’t really see this as a bad thing if we want people with lower incomes to get off ICE cars, although I can see how people who paid those prices would be annoyed. Expecting cars to hold their value or depreciate slowly seems overly optimistic in general, as they are inherently depreciating assets and should never be seen as investments.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      That’s not depreciation that’s just a response to the highest interest rates we’ve seen in 20+ years and dwindling sales numbers.

      This is no different than the monthly sales we used to see on every car prior to COVID but this was somewhat obscured by the nature of the dealership model and having to haggle on the actual price of the car.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        That’s not depreciation that’s just a response to the highest interest rates we’ve seen in 20+ years and dwindling sales numbers.

        Of course its depreciation. Its the very definition of depreciation. An asset was worth more at a point in the past than it is today. The reason for the value loss is irrelevant.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          The definition of depreciation is:

          a reduction in the value of an asset with the passage of time, due in particular to wear and tear.

          The MSRP going down isn’t depreciation as you’re referring to a brand new item that you haven’t even purchased and hasn’t been used.

          Prices shot way up during COVID and now they’re coming back to reality in response to higher interest rates and slowing sales across the entire automotive market, not just with EVs. Housing prices have come down too but again that doesn’t mean depreciation, it’s just a response to interest rates being 2-3x higher than they were just a couple of years ago and sale prices adjusting accordingly (you’re still paying more overall with interest).

          The context here is that “people are concerned about depreciation,” but why would people be concerned that they’re able to buy these cars new at a slightly cheaper price to begin with? Most people prefer to pay as little as possible for things, which is the whole point of companies having a sale on their products.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            The definition of depreciation is:

            a reduction in the value of an asset with the passage of time, due in particular to wear and tear.

            Look at the first half of that sentence. Thats the same idea I posted with my definition:

            " Its the very definition of depreciation. An asset was worth more at a point in the past than it is today."

            You’re getting hung up on the “wear and tear” thing because that’s a regular way that cars lose value over time, but its not the only way. A Picasso painting continues to slowly deteriorate over time but its value continues to go up because there is a market for people wanting his paintings. This would be an “appreciated asset” even though it still gets wear and tear.

            The context here is that “people are concerned about depreciation,” but why would people be concerned that they’re able to buy these cars new at a slightly cheaper price to begin with?

            The context here is that “people are concerned about depreciation,” but why would people be concerned that they’re able to buy these cars new at a slightly cheaper price to begin with?

            Because many people buy cars with the expectation of only owning them for a couple of years and then selling them for something newer. If the value of their EV dropped by 50% in two years of ownership instead of dropping perhaps 20% of specific ICE cars, the they would be concerned about the depreciation. Even people that don’t sell so quickly want an asset that retains its value in case it gets totaled (and they need to buy a new replacement) or in case they need to sell it for emergency liquidity.

            • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              Okay assuming we do go with your definition, the 2019 Model 3 LR was $36,000, meaning they’ve appreciated by $11,000 over the last 5 years. Once again this disproves your point.

              The 2022 numbers you picked were the absolute peak of COVID era pricing, but they’re still selling for more than they used to, meaning they aren’t depreciating at all.

              • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                26 days ago

                Okay assuming we do go with your definition, the 2019 Model 3 LR was $36,000

                I’m not sure where you’re getting $36k for the price of a 2019 Model 3 LR (in 2019). This link seems to show it at $43k, but the real price is irrelevant to your point, so I’ll agree with your $36k for this discussion.

                meaning they’ve appreciated by $11,000 over the last 5 years.

                If you can find someone that will give you $47k for your 2019 Model 3 LR, then yes. The market value of an asset isn’t determined by guidebooks, but by what someone will give you for it if you’re selling it, or what you have to pay for it to buy it for yourself.

                The 2022 numbers you picked were the absolute peak of COVID era pricing, but they’re still selling for more than they used to, meaning they aren’t depreciating at all.

                I have a 2022 Model 3 LR. I have zero faith that today anyone would give me what I paid for it even if it had zero miles on it. Why would they when they could buy the 2024 for less money? What I paid for my car is irrelevant to what it will sell for today.

                If you’re looking at whether your asset appreciated or depreciated, there are only two numbers that matter:

                • What it original cost you to buy the asset.
                • What someone will buy the asset from you today.

                If someone will pay you more than you paid, that asset appreciated. If the best you can do is someone paying less than you paid for it, that asset depreciated. That’s the literal definition of appreciation and depreciation.

                • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  Dude, you’re all over the place. You’re now comparing used car prices to new car prices when previously you were comparing new car prices from prior years to new car prices from today.

                  If I go out and buy a 2024 Model 3 LR for $47k, how much depreciation have I incurred? Previously you said it’s at least a few thousand dollars because they cost more in 2022, but now you’re saying it only matters what today’s purchase price is compared to what I could sell it for used. You can’t have it both ways.

                  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    26 days ago

                    Dude, you’re all over the place. You’re now comparing used car prices to new car prices when previously you were comparing new car prices from prior years to new car prices from today.

                    I am all over the place because I’m trying to show you what matters is where you come from what you paid for it versus how much you can sell that item right now to determine if its appreciating or depreciating.

                    If I go out and buy a 2024 Model 3 LR for $47k, how much depreciation have I incurred?

                    Slightly more than $7500, as that is the amount of the tax credit. Any buyer that is in the market for a 2024 Model 3 LR has the choice to buy it directly from Tesla for the $47k with all of the trust and benefits (possibly preferential pricing on financing). So you’ll likely have to discount yours by a couple thousand for someone to take the risk you didn’t do something to the car in the short time you’ve owned it.

                    So my estimated final answer to your scenario is: Your 2024 Model 3 LR is now worth 37,500.

                    Previously you said it’s at least a few thousand dollars because they cost more in 2022

                    I’m not seeing where I said that. Can you link/quote my words where you’re seeing that?

                    but now you’re saying it only matters what today’s purchase price is compared to what I could sell it for used.

                    Okay I see, you’re getting stuck on a minor point for this part.

                    In economics there’s a concept call substitution. Lets say you have THE ONLY Model 3 LR ever made. Lets also assume the tax credit never existed because that just makes this even more complicated (and doesn’t change the outcome). If someone wants a Model 3 LR they have no choice but to buy it from you. If they only wanted a Model 3 LR, and no other car would suit them, then there would be zero substitution options open to them. They’d have to pay you what you’re asking regardless of how high or low that price was.

                    However with Tesla Model 3 LR there are lots of options for substitution. If they simply wanted a Tesla, and you had the only Tesla Model 3 LR ever made, they would laugh at you if you asked for the $52k you paid in 2022. They would happily buy a 2024 Model Y for less money directly from Tesla. So worse for you in this scenario, you don’t have the only Tesla Model 3 LR ever made, so if your theoretical buyer wanted a Tesla Model 3 LR, they could put your 2022 (assuming yours had zero miles) where you’re wanting to get your full $52k back next to a 2024 which only costs $47k from Tesla.

                    The buyer will probably choose the 2024 for $5k less than your 2022. They see no value in paying an extra $5k for your 2022 because they are substituting a 2024 instead. So how much would you have to discount your 2022 before the buyer will buy yours over the 2024? $5k? No. That puts your 2022 and Tesla’s 2024 at the exact same price. So you’ll have to go even lower because the buyer can get, as an example, the Highline refresh on the 2024 which the 2022 hasn’t. So you’d probably need to knock another couple thousand off at least to make your 2022 be priced at $45k to be below the 2024 at $47k.

                    Since you paid $52k for the Model 3 in 2022, and you’ve now sold it for $45k, you had depreciation of of $7k. Again this scenario excludes all tax credit because it just complicates the explanation and doesn’t change the outcome that the 2022 has deprecated.