• neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Just a reminder: yesterday (June 4 2024) marked the 35 year anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre.

    Some relevant links:

  • bdonvrOPA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Was anyone else told/under the assumption this guy got run over? Wild.

    • 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      I remember the video from the next day and a lot of people were run over. All of the acts of that part of history get conflated in memory. That’s why it’s good to have video and good to have professional historians.

      • bdonvrOPA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Link? I’ve never seen this.

        • kakes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t have links, but at least from what I’ve heard, they were washing people down the drains afterward.

        • 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t have a link right now. I literally remember seeing it on the television on the nightly news in the United States.

          • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            That is definitely not true! The killing that did happen was in the streets surrounding Tiananmen Square. This is now the official USA position, and recently declassified diplomatic cables confirm that the initial reports were incorrect.

              • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Only that while an atrocity clearly occurred, you’re one of many with false memories about the event. It’s a clear example of the propagation of a false narrative and it’s okay to acknowledge that. People are literally swearing they saw footage which doesn’t exist, and their response is “so what it I’m completely wrong, China is still bad”. At the very least, that’s interesting.

                • WldFyre@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  What false narrative?? I’ve never heard anyone claim that all the violence and killing happened only directly on the square, what a bizarre counter claim that changes nothing lol

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      That’s a common tool of propaganda. If you lie outright, you can get caught, and the audience may not believe you in the first place. The real trick is to leave gaps for the audience to fill in with their imagination, and if you’re doing it skillfully, they’ll end up not only believing what you want them to, but also thinking it was their idea all along. I’ve even seen the video cut to show the tank moving in the man’s direction, and then cut away before it stops, creating the impression that the full video would show him getting run over and is not included because it would be too graphic - for example, 3:14 in this bizarre psyop recruitment ad.

      • newnton@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I don’t think I’ve heard anyone imply that he’s important because he’s a martyr, it’s the fact he believes in his cause strongly enough and he was brave enough to stare down inevitable death and force the other guy to blink that’s so memorable about that image (at least for me and those I’ve spoken to about it)

        The psyops propaganda you posted is definitely cringe af but it seems to clearly show the tank turning in the clip, calling it a clear example of misleading people into thinking he was killed is a pretty big stretch imo

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t think I’ve heard anyone imply that he’s important because he’s a martyr

          Why did you read my comment but not the one I was replying to?

          The psyops propaganda you posted is definitely cringe af but it seems to clearly show the tank turning in the clip

          Right, because the tank did turn, so they can’t show a clip of it driving straight at him because that clip doesn’t exist. But given that it’s on screen for about one second, I would venture to guess that some people might not be examining that too closely, and would just see that the tank is moving.

          calling it a clear example of misleading people into thinking he was killed is a pretty big stretch imo

          It’s not about directly misleading people, as I said. It’s about leaving ambiguity and subtly hinting at what that ambiguity might be, while leaving yourself plausible deniability. To simply lie directly is a crass and obvious form of propaganda, to be used sparingly. If you’re looking for propaganda in the mindset of looking for a “smoking gun” that would hold up in court, you don’t understand the nature of it. It’s an art. It’s advertising. I couldn’t prove to a jury what Shakespeare wanted the audience to take away from Hamlet, but that doesn’t mean I can’t analyze it and make educated guesses.

          Obviously, anyone who’s seen the full video or knows the story won’t be fooled, but that’s not the point. If some number of people come away thinking what you want them to think, and the origin of that thought can’t be traced back to you in an incriminating way, then you did your job.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    Would have preferred no music. I don’t need cues to tell me when I should feel suspense.

    Brave dude. No one knows if he was apprehended except for the intelligence or military services in China.

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    What a brave dude and a terrible thing. At least all 42 000 Chinese students were granted full asylum in a unilateral decision by Bob Hawke, our PM at the time.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Such restraint. He could have annihilated that entire column of tanks with just one swing of his TREMENDOUS BALLS.

    • bdonvrOPA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Why would I be banned for showing a video of a guy standing in front of some tanks, climbing on them and annoying them, then going away unharmed?

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    6 months ago

    At least the CCP is open to criticism and debate about their actions back then.

    If you go to Tiananmen today, you will see and hear a lot of discussion of this troubling time in China’s recent history. Sure, sometimes the debate about one party authoritarian rule vs the colonial nature of Western-style democracy can get heated, but there are police around in clearly marked uniforms to make sure it doesn’t get out of hand. Never again!