floofloof@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoUS Supreme Court lifts ban on gun bump stockswww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square70linkfedilinkarrow-up1232arrow-down13cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1229arrow-down1external-linkUS Supreme Court lifts ban on gun bump stockswww.bbc.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square70linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarecygnus@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down7·1 year agoOK, so you want more of the same just because this particular case aligns with your preferences? How about demanding a SC that narrowly does its job without acting like they it gets to decide what the law is?
minus-squareBajaTacos@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down3·1 year agoMy comment is that this is already a rogue court when the case aligns with their beliefs.
minus-squareLiz@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoAnd that’s bad. We don’t like that.
minus-squaretakeda@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIt’s actually more of the same in this case as well, this position was just easier to defend.
OK, so you want more of the same just because this particular case aligns with your preferences? How about demanding a SC that narrowly does its job without acting like they it gets to decide what the law is?
My comment is that this is already a rogue court when the case aligns with their beliefs.
And that’s bad. We don’t like that.
It’s actually more of the same in this case as well, this position was just easier to defend.