• cfgaussian@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This article omits that sort of discussion because it is not relevant. This article is about Georgia mending its relations with Russia, which is objectively a good thing for both countries and a defeat for the US empire.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      Georgia mending its relations with Russia

      And who is controlling the political party who is “mending it’s relations with Russia”? The same man who funded the rose revolution, the same man who happened to buy up the industry of Georgia afterwards?

      This isn’t about geopolitics, it’s about a billionaire trying to set up a dictatorship.

      • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        This isn’t about geopolitics

        This is about geopolitics, that’s exactly the point of the article. You seem very fixated on this one individual but there are larger forces at play and there is a bigger geopolitical context that this fits into.

        If bourgeois interests that once supported Georgia’s submission to US diktat and aggressive anti-Russian policies are now turning in a different direction and in doing so are daring to draw the ire of the US empire that is a sign of which way the geopolitical winds are blowing.

        It means that something has fundamentally changed in the global balance of power and various actors around the world are reorienting according to what they perceive as being in their best interest.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          You seem very fixated on this one individual but there are larger forces at play and there is a bigger geopolitical context that this fits into.

          There is literally no player larger than ivanishvili in the region… He has controlled Georgian politics for the last 30 years. Which is why it is so academically dishonest to leave him out of the article, especially when the author was blaming his cronies for Georgia’s contemporary issues.

          bourgeois interests that once supported Georgia’s submission to US diktat and aggressive anti-Russian policies are now turning in a different direction and in doing so are daring to draw the ire of the US empire that is a sign of which way the geopolitical winds are blowing.

          Right, but we’ve already gone through this before with ivanishvili. He has a long established history of supporting whatever side further empowers his grip over Georgian politics and economics. He funded the rose revolution, then threw the leaders of the rose revolution under the bus, and then established his own neolib political party. Jumping between supporting Russia and the west as it suits his interest.

          He is never going to detach himself from western interest, this recent shift is just a bartering chip. He is hoping that if he can scare the west into thinking he is aligning with Russia that they will allow him to do whatever he wants in Georgia.

          • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            He has a long established history of supporting whatever side further empowers his grip over Georgian politics and economics.

            And currently the West doesn’t seem to be offering that support. They seem to be doing the opposite by organizing protests aimed at toppling the government.