• AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    You can’t say SpaceX does things better and cheaper if you aren’t looking at the whole picture. Yes, SpaceX is largely privately funded, and estimates are that they’re only recently turning a profit, and at that it’s because of billions in Starlink revenue.

    Likely a great deal for the government, for sure, of they can get someone else to pay the development costs. But don’t imply that the big primes are to expensive or are too bloated if you aren’t going to compare actual costs.

    • sartalon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      So you are arguing that cost plus has been the way to go?

      When clearly Boeing’s performance has shown that they’ve been sucking at the tax payer teat for decades.

      Meanwhile SpaceX took on the risk of the development cost without using the tax payer as a bottomless ATM. They did it quicker AND cheaper.

      So yes, they have done it WORLDS better and you are a fucking idiot to argue otherwise.

      Musk aside (yes the man has proved himself to to be another narcissistic moron with more money than sense), but SpaceX did highlight the gluttony of the what the space industry has become.

      You CANNOT argue that any program can come close to SpaceX.

      You make a comment about that one program, (moon-whatever) that got cancelled, and while that sucks, it was because priorities changed. Both sides admitted to it and you are using it falsely as some sort of earmark of failure of the overall program.

      Yet you say the other guy is arguing in bad faith.

      Fuck Elon Musk, but you are kind of a douche too, to downplay what those engineers have done. They literally turned the industry upside down and here you are, talking shit.

      What the fuck have you done?

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        The one area of technology that SpaceX has really contributed is landing a booster. Oh, and load balancing across such a large number of engines, too. Most of the other stuff is things NASA has been doing for many decades, without nearly the number of failures and exploded hardware.

        Their business model is what turned the industry upside down. Putting tens of billions of private money into something is going to do that. But now that Russia isn’t competing for astronaut launches, SpaceX is increasing the launch price. It’s way too early to say they aren’t going to be sucking off that government teat.