The Lemmy Club
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgM to Humanities & Cultures@beehaw.org · 2 years ago

Science Stopped Believing in Porn Addiction. You Should, Too

www.psychologytoday.com

external-link
message-square
3
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
0
external-link

Science Stopped Believing in Porn Addiction. You Should, Too

www.psychologytoday.com

Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgM to Humanities & Cultures@beehaw.org · 2 years ago
message-square
3
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
What does it mean that religion, not porn use, predicts porn-related problems?
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • lemillionsocks@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah the whole porn addiction thing is nonsense especially with how religious right often portrays it. They make it seem like a genuine drug where watching porn will ruin you and your relationships and it wont be long before you’re shunning life and relationships because you’re too busy studying your porn.

    I do think that it can be a sign of other mental illness in one’s life. People who utilize livecams and chats can find themselves in parasocial relationships, and people can self medicate with a quick dopamine hit by watching porn.

    Diagnosing the root cause as porn addiction is like diagnosing someone with a hoarding disorder as having an old newspaper addiction. Like no this is a symptom of something bigger and healthy people are able to consume the news without it becoming a problem.

  • toneinfielder@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not an expert but I’m inclined to believe the other side. David Ley is on XHamster’s payroll.

    From https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/critiques-of-questionable-debunking-propaganda-pieces/david-ley-is-now-being-compensated-by-porn-industry-giant-xhamster-to-promote-its-websites-and-convince-users-that-porn-addiction-and-sex-addiction-are-myths/

    Will Ley tell xHamster customers that every study ever published on males (about 70) links more porn to less sexual and relation satisfaction? Will Ley tell them that all 52 neurological studies on porn users/sex addicts report brain changes seen in drug addicts? Will he inform his audience that 50% of porn users report escalating to material they previously found uninteresting or disgusting? Somehow I doubt it.

    This doesn’t look like mere religious fundamentalism to me, it looks like there is a shitload of research that supports the idea of excessive porn use being harmful. Is it addictive in the sense that heroin is addictive, no, probably not.

    https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/

    • Bitnik@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Gary Wilson’s Your Brain on Porn is a problematic source. It’s not a peer reviewed academic source and its citations should be taken with a pinch of salt. The tone of the website often appears downright unhinged, especially when discussing the work of clinical experts such as neuroscientist Nicole Prouse.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Wilson_(author)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicole_Prause

      Clinical Psychologist David Ley’s publishing history includes many relevant contributions to peer reviewed publications.

      https://www.davidleyphd.com/publications

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_J._Ley

      Neither APA’s DSM-V nor WHO’s ICD-11 recognise any addiction disorder related to pornography. While ICD-11 recognises compulsive sexual behaviour disorder (CSBD), the absence of a close fit to established addiction models has been remarked. On the other hand, there is a substantial cottage industry based on this pseudoscientific concept.

Humanities & Cultures@beehaw.org

humanities@beehaw.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Human society and cultural news, studies, and other things of that nature. From linguistics to philosophy to religion to anthropology, if it’s an academic discipline you can most likely put it here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Food

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 20 users / day
  • 123 users / week
  • 258 users / month
  • 593 users / 6 months
  • 5 local subscribers
  • 2.86K subscribers
  • 421 Posts
  • 1.26K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.org
  • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
  • gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
  • luckless@beehaw.org
  • Chris Remington@beehaw.org
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org