Voters thought the faltering president was too old, but allies looked the other way, advisers defended his abilities and the Democratic Party boxed out other candidates

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/8nX8l

  • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    This article is like 10 days old but feels like it’s about a year out of date already. What a whirlwind.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      At least they pivoted before we got locked in with a horrible candidate. Unlike last time, Hilary.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I truly believe this was calculated. It never would have happened if they didn’t schedule that debate so early. Imagine this happening mid September.

        • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Calculated, but epically backfired. The point of the early debate was to nip all the ‘too old to run’ discourse in the bud, but it did precisely the opposite.

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I just think the opposite. I think the people in charge knew he shouldn’t run because of his age. There was a report that Obama and George Clooney had serious concerns after some fund raiser which led to Clooney writing that op ed after the debate.

            If he gave Obama and Clooney concerns, I guarantee there were more people before that that had concerns.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 months ago
    Wall Street Journal Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    Name: Wall Street Journal Bias: Right-Center
    Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wall-street-journal/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.