A social media trend, dubbed the “Kia Challenge,” has appeared to compound the automakers’ problems in recent years, with people posting videos showing how to steal Hyundai and Kia cars. At its height, the Kia Challenge was linked to at least 14 reported crashes and eight fatalities, according to figures from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

About 9 million vehicles have been impacted by the rash of thefts, including Hyundai Elantras and Sonatas as well as Kia Fortes and Souls. Hyundai and Kia earlier this year agreed to pay $200 million to settle a class-action lawsuit filed by drivers who had their vehicles stolen.

Technology is helping foil car thieves making life miserable for owners of Hyundai and Kia vehicles.

Hyundai and Kia upgraded their cars’ anti-theft tech in early 2023. Vehicles equipped with the enhanced software will only start if the owner’s key, or an identical duplicate, is in the ignition.

The rate at which the Korean automakers’ cars are stolen has fallen by more than half since the companies upgraded their anti-theft software, according to new research from the Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI). Hyundai and Kia thefts have soared in recent years after criminals discovered that certain car models lacked engine immobilizers — technology that has long been standard in other vehicles.

  • Grippler@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Keyless start is fucking awesome though, just get in the car and drive. I wouldn’t even consider a car without after having one with it. Pretty much all other manufacturers have this in a safe way that doesn’t make the cars easier to steal. Its not the keyless start that’s the issue, its how they implemented it.

    I mean, many new cars don’t even have an old school key ignition at all.

    • AceBonobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      A lot of smart key cars are vulnerable to relay attacks. It’s not a solved security issue by any means.

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nobody is fucking doing that, though! This isn’t a “oh I will hack this person using a relay attack” attack, it’s some dumb kids breaking into cars using physical measures. They are NOT going to be using a RELAY ATTACK

        • OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          They are. It’s not incredibly common, but it’s not rare.

          My coworker had his car stolen from his driveway. He believes it was a relay attack.

          That being said, it’s super easy to mitigate by putting your keys in a metal bin.

      • Grippler@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        AFAIK they’re not anymore vulnerable than central locking systems

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes they are, because keyless listens to the car asking for authorization, so you can amplify the car signal hoping the key is not too far off, and unlock the car without any other work.

    • astrsk@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      What’s more, all keyless cars still have a fob with proximity and if the fob dies, they legally have to have a way to start the car without the fob battery which is why they all have an nfc reader somewhere (usually in a cup holder) so you can put you dead fob on it and the car will start like normal.

      • Grippler@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        So what was the exploit then? They could get in to the car without the key?

        • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          No engine immobilizer was the ultimate issue. And from what I understand, it was just an issue with models sold in the US, so all this misery was caused by a manufacturer’s cost saving measure.

          ETA: To clarify, the cause was a manufacturer’s cost saving measure enabled by the US regulations’ lack of a requirement for engine immobilizers.

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, by breaking the window. Then they rip out the ignition cylinder and turn the electrical switch just like on old cars. They didn’t put any kind of electronics into the key to prevent this from happening. Most keys from about 1999+ have an NFC type “chip” in them that prevents the car from starting without a key that is programmed to the car.

          • Grippler@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Aah, so it actually has absolutely nothing to do with keyless access and driving like most seem to complain about.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Still, it would be cool if they didn’t charge hundreds of dollars for a replacement key that costs them a couple bucks.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s…not how rolling codes and tight timing requirements work. There are almost zero keyless entry car models that can be unlocked, let alone started, with hardware at the sophistication level of a flipper.

        • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah I did a little homework after I made the comment n realized I was wrong. Didn’t get a chance to go back n remove or fix it.

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I mainly pushed back because the Flipper Zero is an amazing toy to teach novices young and old about the basics of radios, computing, and cryptography. But they are facing backlash around the world from uneducated, reactionary, “think of the children” mouth breathers and you shouldn’t give those chucklefucks any more ammo in their misinformation belt.

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’re an insane person if you think KIA BOIZ are using a fucking flipper and not opportunistically attacking parked cars hahahaha

      • Grippler@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That’s no different than if you had central locking and a douche nearby (but significantly further away than keyless access and start) to intercept it as you lock/unlock it. Risk of this actually happening to you is so slim, it’s not an issue in real life.