I think a little clarification is needed. No. I don’t actually think everyone there is insane. I don’t care about the bans so stop trying to use that. HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point

Edit: Feel free to keep trying to brigade me. It’s not going to scare me to take this down

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      42·
      2 months ago

      Perhaps now is the time.

      No, Time for condoning class war and murder is never and nowhere.

      Go back to hexbear, you poor, uneducated, lying, bolshevik piece of shit.

      But thank you for showing anyone who may have not had an experience with you before what type of people you are.

      One can always count on that, you morons just can’t help yourself.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.worldEnglish
      44·
      3 months ago

      Your portrayal of them just being made into regular peasants seems to me viewing the whole affair with more than rose colored glasses.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dekulakization

      All kulaks were assigned to one of three categories:[4]
      Those to be shot or imprisoned as decided by the local secret political police. Those to be sent to Siberia, the North, the Urals, or Kazakhstan, after confiscation of their property. Those to be evicted from their houses and used in labour colonies within their own districts.

      By most people’s reckoning in most of planet earth they stole the lawfully earned property of kulaks and either murdered them or otherwise destroyed their lives. Treating them worse than most developed nations treat burglars and thieves.

      If someone shot your grandpa and your uncle, send half your people to Siberia to die out there, and sent the other half to prison locally of course you would flee with whatever you could carry and of course you would at that point be an enemy of the regime that destroyed your life.

      So if the original commenter’s great grandparents were kulaks who “suffered at the hands of the soviet union,” they deserved it.

      I don’t understand your justification for what is ultimately pretty horrific treatment foisted on people ultimately just participating lawfully in society up until that point.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.worldEnglish
          35·
          3 months ago

          America didn’t go from legally sanctioning a behavior to murdering the people today who were behaving lawfully yesterday even if they were immoral fucks. If you don’t understand that then you don’t understand how normal societies run.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        21·
        2 months ago

        You don’t get to call directing state power against the petite bourgeoisie a brutal police regime when your government is supporting the most brutal dictatorships in Africa, whose violence is directed at the working class.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            41·
            2 months ago

            The vital context is wielding state power against internal threats. Which literally every state must do to continue to exist. It’s not whataboutism to point out that the state you currently live in is currently doing far worse, for far worse reasons in a context where your criticism can only be used for anticommunism.

            Would you say it’s constructive for an Israeli to be critical of gay rights in Palestine? Of course not, because divorced of context, it only carries water for imperialism

              • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                21·
                2 months ago

                Nobody is advocating power abuse. One of the books I try to get people to read, Life and Terror in Stalin’s Russia contextualizes the scale of and how such abuses occurred in a much more useful criticism than “communism bad Stalin evil, that’s why you can’t ever do anything about rightists organizing against the state”.

                A good accompaniment to illustrate what it looks like and what the consequences are when the left fails to take appropriate action once in power is The Jakarta Method

                  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                    3·
                    2 months ago

                    the end doesn’t justify the means

                    Suppression of the right was necessary, however the relative freedom given to locals to carry it out resulted in people using it to settle old scores or non-ideological people to advance politically within the party. While dekulization enabled them, those actions were orthogonal (and actually hindered) the aims of dekulization.

                    Whether that can be considered justification or apologia isn’t constructive IMO. Personally though, I just consider it an error in the way it was carried out.

                    Similar issues (and resulting sentiments) are observed in the wake of Mao giving villages the freedom to set up their own courts and try landlords and others.

                    It’s […] vital to denounce them if you consider yourself a leftist.

                    We had that struggle back when Kruschev sent the tanks into Hungary and every western leftist org was falling over each other to denounce the USSR. Meanwhile nazis were being put in charge of police forces in South America to do crimes against humanity against indigenous and communist elements and hundreds of thousands were being massacred in South Korea.

                    Turns out the tankies were right. Denouncing the enemies of the state you live in just serves to carry water for imperialism.