Why politicians should not own stocks

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Waahhh” huh? What a ridiculous reply.

      Okay, how’s Tommy Tuberville? But who cares. I’m not visiting your “x” link but sources I’ve seen don’t even have pelosi in the top 10. Republicans are just obsessed with attacking her even now that she’s not Speaker. Talk about “waahhh”. That’s fine, if you want to engage in massive hypocrisy, wring your hands about imaginary problems and pretend everything bad is democrats, that’s very on brand for conservatives.

      Anyway, yes, you should be concerned about ethical lapses of Congress members even if you don’t recognize their names.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Where’d that data come from? Do congresspeople have public portfolios?

          If so, it becomes a solved problem because we can just subscribe to the top performers’ portfolios to keep up (and nullify their advantage).

          If they don’t have public portfolios how was this generated?

          • realcaseyrollins
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes, all their portfolios are public. Unusual Whales actually tracks all their trades and offers tools to mimic their trades if you so desire. Many people watch what stocks people like Nancy Pelosi purchase and use them to guide their own decision-making.