Three individuals targeted National Gallery paintings an hour after Phoebe Plummer and Anna Holland were jailed for similar attack in 2022

Climate activists have thrown tomato soup over two Sunflowers paintings by Vincent van Gogh, just an hour after two others were jailed for a similar protest action in 2022.

Three supporters of Just Stop Oil walked into the National Gallery in London, where an exhibition of Van Gogh’s collected works is on display, at 2.30pm on Friday afternoon, and threw Heinz soup over Sunflowers 1889 and Sunflowers 1888.

The latter was the same work targeted by Phoebe Plummer and Anna Holland in 2022. That pair are now among 25 supporters of Just Stop Oil in jail for climate protests.

  • HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    You seem to be ok with causing harm unrelated to the action taken. This is just identifying what that line is.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I just don’t see how vandalizing artwork helps the cause. Please explain it to me.

        • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yesterday you were not talking about climate change. Today you are. Because someone threw soup at a painting and sat down, waiting to be arrested. Had they not done so, you likely would not be talking about climate change.

          • eatthecake@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Noone is talking about climate change. They’re talking about shitty protest tactics and why they hate them.

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            We’ve been talking about climate change either way. We’re also not talking about climate change, but people claiming climate change while vandalizing.

            • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Perhaps you are. I would assume you’re already probably at least somewhat on board with environmental causes.

              How do you think a person who lives in the middle of nowhere, doesn’t have much of an education or anything, would react if they saw someone doing this? Probably that they must care a lot to get arrested for doing something intentionally. What makes it worth it? What are they about? Oh, something called Just Stop Oil… oh, an environmental group. Something called climate change? If it’s actually happening, I guess we should be doing something about that.

              • HobbitFoot
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                How do you think a person who lives in the middle of nowhere, doesn’t have much of an education or anything, would react if they saw someone doing this?

                Fucking liberals who want to destroy everything, just like how I’ve heard on the few news sources I have bombard me with propaganda all the time.

                • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I hear that, really I do. But here’s the thing - if you don’t have faith in humanity then we’re all screwed anyway. And nihilism is not the answer. Never is.

    • DeadPand@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The painting wasn’t “harmed”,

      ‘In passing his sentence, Hehir said he took into account not only the damage caused to the frame but the potential for even greater damage to be caused to the painting had the soup seeped behind the glass that covered it.’

      The frame is also not a human being, and no where did I imply I was ok with harming any person you jackass, false equivalence much?