US couple blocked from suing Uber after crash say daughter agreed to terms while using Uber Eats
www.theguardian.com
New Jersey appeals court sides with ride-hailing company, saying arbitration provision in terms was ‘valid’

This case is quite similar with Disney+ case.

You press ‘Agree’, you lost the right to sue the company.

  • blubfisch@discuss.tchncs.de
    32·
    3 个月前

    Fun fact: in Germany, anything “unexpected” they write in TOS is not legally binding, because everyone knows noone reads it.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      3·
      3 个月前

      Also any clause like this would be thrown out as a violation of laws anyways. You cannot deny a party to seek damages for events completely unrelated to the scope of the contract. Especially not indefinitely into the future or for actions subject to criminal law.