Nemeski@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agoAT&T tries to defend why it shouldn't let you unlock your phone soonerwww.androidauthority.comexternal-linkmessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1381arrow-down14
arrow-up1377arrow-down1external-linkAT&T tries to defend why it shouldn't let you unlock your phone soonerwww.androidauthority.comNemeski@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-squareunderwire212@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up86arrow-down1·18 hours agoBasically, AT&T argues against it saying it’ll force them to innovate and be competitive with other services. Won’t anyone think of the poor telecom shareholders??
minus-squareGormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down1·17 hours agoAll I see with that statement is, “Please Federal Government, hit me with your breakup hammer.”
minus-squareReverendIrreverence@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 hours ago hit me with your breakup hammer… hard
Basically, AT&T argues against it saying it’ll force them to innovate and be competitive with other services.
Won’t anyone think of the poor telecom shareholders??
All I see with that statement is, “Please Federal Government, hit me with your breakup hammer.”
hard