Dot.@feddit.org to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-29 months agoCox asks supreme court to reject record labels' petition over ISPs 'Piracy Profits'.torrentfreak.comexternal-linkmessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up176arrow-down11
arrow-up175arrow-down1external-linkCox asks supreme court to reject record labels' petition over ISPs 'Piracy Profits'.torrentfreak.comDot.@feddit.org to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-29 months agomessage-square5linkfedilink
minus-squareRivalarrival@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·9 months agoDance halls and hotels don’t have “safe harbor” provisions as a matter of law, and their services to performers are not deemed a “human right”.
minus-squarehedgehog@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 months agoYes, but have you seen some of the decisions the Supreme Court has come up with?
minus-squareITGuyLevi@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·9 months agoAll those examples have the company (the ISP in this case) choosing to hire someone, this would be more similar to: If someone rents a hotel room, and then gets busted by the police for prostitution, is the hotel liable?
deleted by creator
Dance halls and hotels don’t have “safe harbor” provisions as a matter of law, and their services to performers are not deemed a “human right”.
Yes, but have you seen some of the decisions the Supreme Court has come up with?
All those examples have the company (the ISP in this case) choosing to hire someone, this would be more similar to:
If someone rents a hotel room, and then gets busted by the police for prostitution, is the hotel liable?