moonleay@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoDOJ says Google must sell Chrome to crack open its search monopolywww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square165linkfedilinkarrow-up1765arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1763arrow-down1external-linkDOJ says Google must sell Chrome to crack open its search monopolywww.theverge.commoonleay@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square165linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareArchRecord@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up45arrow-down1·edit-25 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squaregap_betweenus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·7 months agoHow exactly is this company going to make any money?
minus-squareAhismaMiasma@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·edit-25 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareArchRecord@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-25 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareJasSmith@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down5·7 months agoThe judge would immediately shut that down for creative avoidance. This is an order to sell, not break up. The DOJ specifically indicated behavioural remedies in this case, meaning Google must not remain in control of Chrome.
minus-squareArchRecord@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-25 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareunderwire212@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoDon’t ya love it when people comment saying something that they think must be true as if it were actually true, without having the slightest idea?
deleted by creator
How exactly is this company going to make any money?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
The judge would immediately shut that down for creative avoidance. This is an order to sell, not break up. The DOJ specifically indicated behavioural remedies in this case, meaning Google must not remain in control of Chrome.
deleted by creator
Don’t ya love it when people comment saying something that they think must be true as if it were actually true, without having the slightest idea?