• cleanandsunny@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      In a word: orientalism. This art movement was predicated on the exoticism and “othering” of subject matter and the bystanders serve as a proxy for the audience of the art itself.

      • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Orientalism wasn’t an art movement, the picture is in “academic” style.

        IMO your interpretation can be put in a more straightforward/blunt way: the painting is basically pornography built upon cheap cultural stereotypes. (And it really is bizarre that this sort of garbage art gets upvoted to much, simply because it has an air of refinement around itself that excuses its clearly pornographic character.)

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          And it really is bizarre that this sort of garbage art gets upvoted to much, simply because it has an air of refinement around itself that excuses its clearly pornographic character.

          Maybe we’re just upvoting it because we enjoy pornography…lol.

          • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Well, I guess that would be fair, as long as we don’t confuse sexual appeal with artistic value. (Saying this in particular due to a poster guy ITT who said an another poster critical of the painting should “get some culture”.) But the fact that it is posted on an art sublemmy and not some NSFW sublemmy, suggests that the confusion has occurred.

            • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 minutes ago

              But the fact that it is posted on an art sublemmy and not some NSFW sublemmy, suggests that the confusion has occurred.

              Lol. Great point.

              Now I find myself contemplating how long one could theoretically go with a daily cross-post that technically fit the rules of both this and at least one NSFW community…I wonder if they would ever run out of eligible art pieces…

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          This is sad. It’s basically a figure study in 4 parts. Go back and slap whomever you paid for your degree.

          • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            It’s basically a figure study in 4 parts.

            Maybe you should slap your ophthalmologist instead. You’re acting as if the picture does not represent what it literally represents, or as if it does not have the effect that it clearly does have and which it also intended to have. I won’t argue any further against denial of reality.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Once the hookah is lit, they hold little panels with a note based on how well she did. The note count towards her global performance evaluation.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Why is she hunched over the thing in an awkward position? Why not simply hold the mouthpiece in your hand like you’re supposed to?

  • TGhost [She/Her]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Description: Erroneous visions of the Eastern/oriental woman, historically seen only as a sexual object by the white man”

      • TGhost [She/Her]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        In the orientalism movement, lead by Europeans, wich this art is from, yes.
        Sorry for you, I do not make the history.

        If you are unease with arts and the story behinds, don’t go to museums…

  • TehBamski@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Can we get a NSFW tag for these please? I don’t want people thinking that I jackoff to 1800s oil paintings of naked women.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Please put an NSFW tag on this. I was on the train and when I saw this I had to start furiously masterbating. Everyone else gave me strange looks and were saying things like “what the fuck” and “call the police”. I dropped my phone and everyone around me saw this image. Now there is a whole train of men masterbating together at this one image. This is all your fault, you could have prevented this if you had just tagged this post NSFW.

      • tetris11@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you’re cis white male, this behaviour is severely frowned upon. The police will just ask you all to do better, and then arrest the brown guy for watching a muckbang vid

      • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Pornography is not suddenly a great and important piece of culture just because it was nicely painted with a brush a long time ago. It is still pornography.

        What do you mean by “getting some culture”? You mean perhaps studying art history? Because I guarantee countless artists, art historians and critics would deny this painting has much cultural value. The whole style has been heavily and justifiably derired. If anything, what is conservative here is the painting’s view of women (painted according to the sexual tastes of rich European men) and stereotypical treatment of foreign culture.