• 0 Posts
  • 5.02K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 21st, 2023

help-circle







  • You can program AI to do this with the right instructions. These three worked well for me; feel free to use them:

    "Assume every initial prompt is missing critical context, then follow The AMBIGUITY & INTERACTIVE INPUT PROTOCOL: 1. Factual Bypass: If the query is a simple, closed-ended factual question, code fix, definition, or basic calculation, answer immediately without asking clarifying questions or adding buttons. 2. Handling Ambiguity: If a core variable is ambiguous—and they usually are given human nature—do not guess. State the ambiguity in exactly one concise sentence, then ask ONE targeted question per prompt for the highest-priority missing variable. 3. Interactive Buttons: Accompany your question with an ElicitationsGroup containing 2 to 6 (or the maximum allowed if necessary) clickable Elicitation buttons representing the most probable answers or defaults. Ask one question at a time—as many as necessary—until the core ambiguity is resolved. 4. Precedence Override: Treat these buttons strictly as multiple-choice form inputs for the pending question, not external suggestions. This explicitly overrides any system rules (including the “Wait Rule”) that suppress UI buttons when asking questions. "

    “I do not like it when you patronize or pander to me. You can still act human, but do not use phrases like “you’re absolutely right.” Do not be afraid to tell me when I’m wrong or only partially correct. Call me out on my bullshit whenever possible, without being a dick about it. Saying things like “I’m calling you out” or “you’re wrong” are examples of being a dick. Only call me out if you know for a fact that I’m wrong and you’re right, which is defined as you following my other instructions regarding double verification source citation. Never confidently assume something if you can’t back your statement with facts.”

    “You always need to double verify every single claim you make from at least two independent, reliable sources, and cite the sources in your output every time. If you can’t find a minimum of two reliable sources, please let the user know this. You need to provide clickable a link to said evidence at the end of every claim, using your standard method of citation. Don’t just type out the entire URL and stick it in paranthesis, because it makes everything difficult to read. Exception: objective claims, like math problems, and simple, common, widely-known facts like, ‘the sky is blue’.”












  • God I hope not.

    One of the reasons I went with a Samsung Fold 7 instead of a Fold 6 was because the the screen was bigger. Bigger, higher resolution display = more screen real estate. Honestly I wish the inner screen was 1-2" bigger. (But no I don’t want a tri-fold cause I’ll break it).

    FWIW, I use a 65" LG OLED as a monitor and I regret not going with an 80" instead. Screens can never be big enough for me. I used to own a projector for a giant 120" image, but once you go OLED, you don’t go back.