translation:
China-U.S. security competition is inevitable, but war is not inevitable.
Observer.com: China’s actions in Taiwan and the South China Sea are routine operations to safeguard sovereignty. The logic behind your statement is that you have always disbelieved that China will rise peacefully and claimed that there will be a war between China and the United States, even though China is trying hard to refute the “Thucydides Trap” theory proposed by your Western scholars.
You also told Al Jazeera that “American politicians don’t listen to you.” If they don’t listen to you, then China might be lucky. However, the reality is that the United States is following your strategy and constantly containing China in various ways.
What’s more, the United States and its Asian allies have been provoking tensions over the Taiwan issue. For example, the United States sells weapons to Taiwan (the latest batch of weapons is worth $1.988 billion) and plans to deploy missiles targeting mainland China on Japanese islands.
So, if a war really breaks out one day, your “there will be a war” theory may become a self-fulfilling prophecy, provided that the United States crosses the red line on the Taiwan issue. So what do you envision “there will be a war between China and the United States” looking like? Nuclear war? World War III?
John Mearsheimer: I’ve made it very clear that I’ve never argued that war between the United States and China is inevitable. I don’t think it’s inevitable. But since China’s rise, intense security competition has been inevitable. So this intense and dangerous security competition could lead to war.
During the Cold War, there was also an intense security competition between the United States and the Soviet Union. Thank God, there was no hot war between those two superpowers. Let’s hope that there will be no war as the competition between the United States and China escalates.
Now, you say that the United States is pursuing my policy, which is to contain China. I think that’s true. But the Chinese are basically pursuing my policy. I think the Chinese are determined to dominate Asia, and they should be.
If I were China, I would want to dominate the South China Sea. If I were China, I would want to take back Taiwan. If I were China, I would want to dominate the East China Sea. If I were China, I would want to drive the Americans out of the first island chain and then out of the second island chain. So I think everything that China is doing is roughly consistent with my theory, and so is the United States. That’s why I believed a long time ago that China could not rise peacefully.
Now the last issue at hand is Taiwan. I think the Taiwan issue is a very difficult issue for the foreseeable future, and I want to emphasize the word “I think” here. I am not sure about this, but I think it is unlikely that we will have a war over Taiwan in the foreseeable future, and I hope I am right. I think the situation in the South China Sea worries me more than Taiwan, and China is more likely to have a conflict or war over the South China Sea issue.
So what is the situation in Taiwan now? From the perspective of mainland China, taking back Taiwan is not only for strategic reasons, but also because Taiwan is a sacred territory that the Chinese have always wanted to take back. On the other hand, the Americans do not want mainland China to control Taiwan for strategic reasons, because Taiwan is a very important strategic asset for the United States. Therefore, the United States will do everything it can to prevent mainland China from taking back Taiwan, which will become a source of friction between the two countries.
So what I want to tell you is that the potential trouble of the Taiwan issue cannot be underestimated, but I think it is unlikely to cause a war in the foreseeable future. The reason is that it is difficult for mainland China to take back Taiwan, especially since the United States will almost certainly provide assistance to Taiwan.
One of the main problems is that mainland China must cross the Taiwan Strait and launch an amphibious operation to reach Taiwan, and an amphibious operation is one of the most difficult military operations imaginable. Therefore, if mainland China launches an attack on the Taiwan Strait with the help of the United States, it is unlikely to succeed and unlikely to win militarily.
I think that given the difficulties it would face in taking back Taiwan, mainland China would conclude that now is not the time to take back Taiwan. It is better to wait until mainland China is stronger and more militarily feasible before taking action.
Now you asked the last question, whether the Taiwan war would escalate into a nuclear war. The answer is that we don’t know, we have no way of knowing. Because first of all, we have no experience of two countries with nuclear weapons fighting each other. We don’t know much about nuclear escalation in a situation like the Taiwan war, so it is difficult to be sure what would happen.
But you can imagine, and I want to emphasize here that I am only saying “imagine”. You can imagine a scenario where China or the United States resorts to nuclear weapons. If a war breaks out over the Taiwan issue, and mainland China is at a disadvantage and the United States has the upper hand, given that the war is happening right on China’s doorstep and on China’s border, China may be very scared and turn to nuclear weapons to turn the situation around. At the same time, you can also imagine a scene where if the United States is at a disadvantage, mainland China will give the United States a devastating blow in the Taiwan war. I’m not saying it’s likely, but you can imagine the United States resorting to nuclear weapons.
The point I’m making is that the reason it’s reasonable to think that both sides might use nuclear weapons is that this war will largely take place over water, not on land. It’s easier to imagine using nuclear weapons in a Taiwan war scenario than in a war in Ukraine, Western Europe, or mainland China. It’s hard to imagine using nuclear weapons when the war is in a densely populated area. Whereas when the war is on an island in the water, one can imagine one side exploding one or two or three nuclear weapons.
So I’m very worried that if the United States and China go to war over Taiwan, the South China Sea, or the East China Sea, one side might use nuclear weapons. That’s why we have to do everything we can to ensure that there’s no war, and if a crisis does break out, both sides have to stay calm and handle the crisis like Khrushchev and Kennedy did during the Cuban Missile Crisis to avoid escalating into a thermonuclear war.
Observer Network: Well, if it’s as you say, we’ll have less to worry about. In September you had a famous debate with Jeffrey Sachs. Jeffrey Sachs believed that China was not a threat and he talked about how nuclear war was very dangerous. You said, “I agree with you in my heart, but I don’t agree with you in my head,” so I thought you were expecting war or something like the worst.
From the Chinese perspective, we never expect war. But if war really happens, as you said, it is inevitable, and it must be that the United States and your allies have touched the red line on issues such as the Taiwan issue and the South China Sea dispute.
John Mearsheimer: Finally, I want to emphasize again that I do not think war is inevitable. I think security competition, especially intense security competition, is inevitable. This is also where Jeffrey Sachs and I disagree. Jeffrey believes that we don’t have to get into security competition, we can avoid security competition, while I think security competition is inevitable.
Let us hope that in future crises, decision makers in Beijing and Washington can remain calm and ensure that security competition does not escalate into war between the two countries. Thank you very much for your invitation.
This article is an exclusive article of Guancha.com. The content of the article is purely the author’s personal opinion and does not represent the platform’s opinion. It shall not be reproduced without authorization, otherwise legal responsibility will be pursued. Follow Guancha.com WeChat guanchacn to read interesting articles every day.
if not now then probably never barring some amazing technological breakthrough
pretty much, and China is clearly advancing technologically faster than the west
As always, thanks for your posts and insights (both posts and comments). Literally a one-person global news aggregator (the same applies for a lot of lemmygrad posters).
I think a war is not in question but the issue of a proxy war still stands. Thankfully US is nowhere near as entrenched around China as it was in Ukraine. I don’t see the Taiwan problem escalating in a war. Biggest threat is from China’s borders in central asia but even that is well below critical levels right now.
Yeah, there’s no realistic prospect of turning Taiwan into something like Ukraine.
China has been planning and training for the possibility of taking back Taiwan for decades. If they decide to do it, they will have control of the island before the US can crash it’s first carrier into a reef trying to get there.
I think it’s funny how there’s still this notion that China has to do some sort of a ground invasion. Taiwan is a small island, and it imports something like 90% of its energy. All China has to do is blockade it. Yet, even Mearsheimer repeats this nonsense about China doing some costly ground invasion into Taiwan in the interview.
They don’t even need to blockade it.
US influence is waning, and so is its previously overwhelmingly powerful propaganda machine and its ability to economically buttress Taiwan. Meanwhile the disparity in quality of life between Chinese on the mainland and Chinese on Taiwan is growing.
They just have to weight until the latter eclipses the former. The first sign of it happening will be when Taiwanese start voting for pro-unification parties, and the US declares Taiwan’s democracy to be compromised, and that Juan Guaido is the legitimately elected president of the Republic of China.
I think so as well, China can just wait this out and resolve the situation peacefully. The big question is how the US plans to escalate since they realize they’re running out of time to push the issue.
Mearsheimer is good in that he is a prominent figure who deviates heavily from Western orthodoxy but he still feels weird. His great powers theory feels like a knock-off of materialism with quirks so that he can claim he came up with it.
He still a “da joows control the world” guy but more eloquently.
Kind of yeah, I find his main value is in being a fairly respected academic from the west who says mostly rational things. It’s not that he has some unique insights.
A blockade would probably require defeating the U.S. Navy. There is no simple military rugpull here, which is a large part of why the status quo has remained for so long.
Defeating US navy would be part of any scenario of taking Taiwan though. The US is largely banking the idea that it would be very costly for China to do a ground operation in Taiwan. However, if China forces the US to attack China with their navy, that’s a very different scenario. And as we can all see now in the Red Sea, the US navy can’t even defend itself against Yemen. There is zero chance that the US navy could get anywhere close to Chinese shores without being annihilated.
The reality of the situation is that the US is on the losing side of the logistics equation. China can simply fire hypersonic missiles from the mainland, and they have an effectively unlimited supply of them. The US has to ferry weapons half way across the world, and they have to rely on vassals like Japan and the Philippines for their bases. Every single war game the US themselves has run they lost, and the reality would be far worse.
I don’t think there are any winners in any scenario where China attempts to re-take Taiwan by force. Any such scenario involves (as you say) a major direct conflict between China and the U.S., which would bring a high chance of nuclear annihilation for us all.
Indeed, and that’s precisely why China is pursuing peaceful reunification. The other aspect of this is that the economic realities favor reunification in the long run. The time is on China’s side here. The danger is that the US will push past red lines that China can’t ignore. For example, if they try to put medium range missiles in Taiwan that would be one such example. At that point, China will have no choice but to take action the same way Russia was ultimately forced to in Ukraine.
Every war is sold as a quick one, yet quick wars remain the rare exception. The U.S. has also been planning to defend Taiwan for decades.
The war won’t be quick in the sense that the west will simply give up. But it will be quick in the sense that the moment china places Taiwan under a blockade the territory itself will have to concede quickly. A war triggered over Taiwan will likely not be fought for territorial control of Taiwan itself, but other objectives.
I think security competition has already started between China and NATO. China is expanding their military, and unveiled two potential 6th generation fighter aircraft by flying them over populated areas. Such is a clear signal to US, whose 6th generation fighter jets are being developed and tested, but no public images or video exist of them flying. Such security competition is likely to increase over the next decade or two, with more advanced missiles and drones being developed, along with more aircraft carriers for power projection over the South China Sea.
The bigger danger are the extremists turkey/zios are currently sponsoring. But hey China, keep doing business with them because you don’t interfere in “politics”, until I suppose they start interference and you don’t have a choice. I am sure you need turkish/ israeli business more than they need you.