• Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I keep wondering if the incoming tech oligarchy administration will boost stock prices (because that’s how they compound the billions) and that will be enough to keep us in this rut longer than we would be otherwise.

    • gingernate@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The US stock market always performs well during Democratic presidents terms and does not do well during republicans

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Don’t worry, the 401(k) will be rug pulled as well even if the future exists.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Lol … I’m indigenous Canadian and I thought the headline said ‘Native Man’

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’m “investing” by learning self sustainability.

      I wanted to be more proactive, but school systems don’t like hearing about kids who worry about climate change.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That assumes the banks survive. Cash would probably still be useful, but that assumes Trump wont go full Nazi Germany and just print more money eventually to the point of hyperinflation.

          • MNByChoice@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Cash won’t hold its value. Investments, on balance, will. Retirement right before the start of World War I would suck. It would suck more to have no broad based investments.

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              The only reason cash mighty retain value would be because people would still think it does. Really, I have no idea how long that would last. Investments require trust and a working internet in the modern context.

              • MNByChoice@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                In that scenario there is nothing to buy.

                May want to save and invest in case things mostly continue.

                Also, get healthier.

          • FPSXpert@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            This is why one of my “divestments” is non-cash valuable currency, items such as weapons / tool stockpiles, and training / knowledge. Seriously on that last one is so important if you have a day off learn how to use basic hand and power tools. Learn to cook something. Learn how basic gardening works. Take a CPR and Stop the bleed course, how to do basic electrical work, etc. You don’t have to be professional at them but learn how to do them.

            Best case scenario, you can be cheaper and look sexy knowing how to cook clean and repair. Worst case scenario, those are going to be worth more than Benjamins in a true SHTF scenario.

        • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Wouldn’t investing at this point basically means betting for even larger tesla & nvidia? Since these companies comprises huge part of nasdaq.

          • FPSXpert@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            That’s what I would call a bubble. The same has been said for FAANG stocks because they are success stories, and I do think that TSLA and NVDA are large enough with enough assets that they aren’t going belly under overnight.

            That said, there were stock advisers, people with degrees and decades of work in early 2001 saying “Buy Enron!” Same goes for dot com stocks, same goes for cypto bros. I’ve made some pocket change off those two companies “mooning” their share values so I am definitely not complaining, but don’t rely solely on those two to go “line go up” forever. When they did my decision was not to buy more, my decision was to very smartly sell off a small portion to “make my money back” per se, and now the rest is house money basically :)

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Some years ago someone would have said the same about Apple. Years before that, Wintel. Before that, IBM. To the start of time.

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            How this is going to play out is that life is going to get expensive (you ain’t seen nothing yet). Money will help a shit ton. This is also going to be a situation where it’s expensive to be poor, see rent and how interest works.

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              It’s not. I’ll probably die, but most of us will. I never really bought into the promise of infinite growth in a finite system that I was raised to believe in. Everyone narrowly focuses on their own issues, but the larger system is breaking down.

              • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Yeah and the question is what can you do and how can you survive. Vote for Dems, and gather your nestegg by living below your means and investing.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    61
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I learned the hard way that 401k is a scam.
    Just put money in a savings account, people.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        The part where it’s defined-contribution instead of defined-benefit.

        To be perfectly honest, I personally am better served with a 401(k): I’m in an above-average earning career (engineering), have lived well below my means, and am financially literate.

        But most people are not like me. Frankly, the average worker in the US is either not competent or not disciplined enough to both actually contribute enough and invest it properly, and so as a nation we’re careening towards a disaster of geriatric poverty the likes of which hasn’t been seen since before Social Security was invented.

        So yeah, the American working class was definitely scammed when pensions were replaced with 401(k)s. But hell, even if you don’t understand the actual differences and implications, you could also tell it’s fishy even just by the fact that the execs were so eager to switch over!

        • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Definitely some form of financial illiteracy which is certainly unfortunate but not to the detriment of all 401ks

          • baines@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            it kinda is in that 401ks should not allow that pro job / anti worker bullshit

            it’s crazy how we as a society allow all that obvious gatcha type rules just to help rich fucks get richer

              • baines@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                15 hours ago

                oh for sure I agree with you and it is likely his own fault but I do sympathize with his frustration

                • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  How is adding money every paycheck to an account with the promise of it being there later my fault?

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The assumption that you’re going to live to a ripe old age and still remember your own name.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          “Don’t plan for tomorrow because you might not live through today” is a great way to die horribly tomorrow.

          • Loss@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            11 hours ago

            That’s cute but guaranteed if you’re under 30. If you’re under 40, you’re going to lose any and everything you save.

    • Gerudo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Bruh, it’s pretax dollars in an account that 9 times out of 10 out performs interest rates. Even in huge downturns, it will bounce back thanks to stock market goes brrrrrrrrr

            • IMongoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Ya you were scammed or we’re not getting the full story. If it was a real 401k it’s composed of diverse stocks and bonds and stuff and if it hit 0 the US wouldn’t really exist. Unless you were self managing and put it all into a company that stopped existing or something.

              • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                Every job for 34+ years, put money in every paycheck. Become disabled. Look in 401k, there’s not enough for even one months rent.

                I call that bullshit. I don’t care what everyone here thinks. You’re all smart asses until you find out.

                You might get two months rent after 65 years! Whoooo

                • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  You’re math here isn’t working out. Were you putting less than a dollar a paycheck? Did you have one employer the entire time.

                  Assuming you did not, when you changed job did you roll over the previous 401k into a Ira or spend it? Even if you ignored the paperwork, the money should still be out there somewhere.