octopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 天前Facepalm on multiple levelslemmy.mlimagemessage-square137fedilinkarrow-up1965arrow-down112cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1953arrow-down1imageFacepalm on multiple levelslemmy.mloctopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 天前message-square137fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareoctopus_ink@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down1·1 天前I think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
minus-squareCyrus Draegur@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down1·1 天前Exactly. “they can’t do that that’s illegal” Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES
I think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
Exactly.
“they can’t do that that’s illegal”
Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES