• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not that weird of a position. Penn and Teller did a show on it based on the then believed data that vaccines cause autism. (Which has now long since been discredited.)

    They showed the statistics of dying/paralysis/etc were far greater than the chance of autism. So in their opinion, even if vaccines caused autism ( the debunked paper showed a tiny percent chance) , it was still safer to take the vaccine.

    Even if it wasn’t autism, there is a tiny chance your child can have a dangerous reaction to a vaccine. I was nervous with my children but had it done anyway. My son had a minor reaction to the Polio shot and lost the ability to walk for a couple of days.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      i’m not sure what you mean by this, because you seem to be implying that autism is somehow dangerous? which just obviously isn’t true?

      autism isn’t bad, it’s just different. If anything it’s better considering how much we rely on science and technology and organization these days, we could use more autistic people who’ll raise a stink when people skirt protocol for stupid reasons.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s worth remembering that autism is a spectrum. We are at the higher end, many benefits, with limited downsides. Others aren’t as lucky.

        The argument was also a bypass type. Even if vaccines cause autism, and even if autism is entirely bad, it’s still worth getting vaccinated. It cuts a lot of the talking points off at the knee. Even if we assume our opponent’s position, it’s still not an argument in favour of what they are saying.

      • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        They’re not saying it’s bad. They’re just saying “even if you do think it’s bad, the chances are very slim and it’s far better than the alternatives”

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If that’s how we’re doing it, we should get more Asians considering how much we rely on maths. Because Asians are good at math, right?

        It’s not a great idea to stereotype people, even if you think you’re giving them a compliment.