• Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    According to the CEO in the LTT video about this thing it was a design choice made by AMD because otherwise they cannot get the ram speed they advertise.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      There’s camm2, the new standard for high speed removable memory. Asus already has released a motherboard that uses it and it matches the 8000 mts of the Framework which won’t be out until 3Q this year.

      Framework chose non upgradable because it was easier/cheaper. That’s fine except Framework’s entire marketing has been built around upgradeable hardware.

      • javacafe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That chip is one-of-a-kind. Most people and I are getting that PC just because of that chip and the price (the price is very reasonable). Without it that PC is not worth it at all.

      • Adam@doomscroll.n8e.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        In the same video it’s pointed out that this product wouldn’t exist at all without the AMD chip. It’s literally built around it.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Suppose the counter is that the market is chock full of modular options to build a system without framework.

        In the laptop space, it’s their unique hook in a market that is otherwise devoid of modularity. In the desktop space, even the mini itx space, framework doesn’t really need to be serving that modularity requirement since it is so well served already. It might make it so I’m likely to ignore it completely, but I’m not going to be super bothered when I have so many other options