• ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Mass murderers would be handled about the same, ie. taken down by local security after the fact.

    Terrorism would be less likely to happen; without an organized state to terrorize, what’s the point? There’s no one to agree to the terrorists’ demands.

    • wabafee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      There will be violent gangs that would pop up especially when there is no state. So there is still Terrorism unless I misunderstood the term.

      • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        And, like now, those acts would mostly be handled by taking out the shooter after the fact.

        Hopefully without a centralized for-profit news apparatus making the perpetrator infamous and inspiring copycats, though honestly we could achieve that under the current system of government.

      • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Idk mate, I feel like most anarchists are pretty fucken vocal about how we should deal with fascists. What would happen to them within a stateless society is probably what we say should happen 🤷‍♀️