SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 2 days agoHousing Rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square214fedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down120cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1998arrow-down1imageHousing Rulelemmy.worldSoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square214fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarenull_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·4 hours agoYeah, but those places have either poorer employee conditions or higher population density. Neither of which are desirable.
minus-squareFelixCress@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour ago Yeah, but those places have either poorer employee conditions UK would like a word. higher population density. Neither of which are desirable Says who?
Yeah, but those places have either poorer employee conditions or higher population density. Neither of which are desirable.
UK would like a word.
Says who?