Drew@sopuli.xyzM to Programming Circlejerk@programming.dev · edit-21 month ago100 concurrent users = 8640000/daysopuli.xyzimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up118arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up118arrow-down1image100 concurrent users = 8640000/daysopuli.xyzDrew@sopuli.xyzM to Programming Circlejerk@programming.dev · edit-21 month agomessage-square15linkfedilinkfile-text
url: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/umar482_i-just-fired-a-potential-client-with-zero-activity-7303399019093897218-YTg9
minus-squareDrew@sopuli.xyzOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-21 month ago<unjerk> I don’t know if this person is joking, and it scares me. The wall of text in the original post makes me feel like they’re not. why I find this funny This implies there are 100 unique users every second </unjerk>
minus-squareDannyBoy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThe 53+ startups seems like a joke. If you’re not rounding why use the + and not the exact number? Along with this strange interpretation of concurrent users.
minus-squarePumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoThey’re starting up so many startups they don’t have time to adjust their bio every time a new one pops up.
<unjerk>I don’t know if this person is joking, and it scares me. The wall of text in the original post makes me feel like they’re not.why I find this funny
This implies there are 100 unique users every second
</unjerk>The 53+ startups seems like a joke. If you’re not rounding why use the + and not the exact number? Along with this strange interpretation of concurrent users.
They’re starting up so many startups they don’t have time to adjust their bio every time a new one pops up.