• dynamoMaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      21 小时前

      What is your problem with WordPress? Isn’t it part of the fediverse and entirely open source?

      • BOFH@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 小时前

        I could open-source defecating into your hands and clapping if you like, but it probably won’t increase demand or convert people, even open source advocates, into true believers if they don’t already like doing it.

        And there are absolutely problems with Mullenweg’s stewardship, whatever else you might think of the product.

        • dynamoMaus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 小时前

          Don’t get me wrong I’m not defending. I was just asking for more context. And from what I read now, I do agree with you.

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        20 小时前

        The plugin ecosystem is full of freemium garbage. It’s also designed so a functional site basically requires the jetpack plugin, which is a connector to automattic’s proprietary SaaS.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        20 小时前

        The codebase is old, like mostly procedural PHP. It’s got a long history of security issues, and is just a pain to work with. And it’s run by a megalomaniac who doesn’t seem to understand what running an open source project is about.

        • dynamoMaus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 小时前

          Interesting. Is there other open source website creator software that is also part of the fediverse?

          I am trying all fedi software and WordPress is last on that list. So I am happy about recommendations

          • jonne@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 小时前

            There’s a bunch of forks of it that are basically the same. Not sure how it works with fediverse stuff.

    • 3DMVR@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 小时前

      I tried some chinese or japanese wp alt, not sure if its opensource started with an H I think, wasnt fully translated but the sites ppl built looked cool

    • 3DMVR@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 小时前

      No gutenberg? I think thats what ive been using since coming back to wp if its the default way of using blocks, I like it. Would you just need to install it as a plugin?

      • asap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 小时前

        Then you do not want to use this. It’s for people who prefer the classic (non-Gutenberg) WP editor - hence the name.

        • 3DMVR@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 小时前

          Forsure, do ppl use the other paid block editors with this?

    • Orangedrops@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 小时前

      Out of interest, is theme development also the same / similar? I own a small agency and we now use Flynt as our base for bulds which is very much reliant on Timber and ACF. I have been developing on WordPress since its initial inception and reading the classic press overview, it sounds like bliss / it literally has stripped out every single annoyance I have with WP and I’m super interested in having a stab with it…