It’s a fact.

  • Bloomcole@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    "They went in to Ukraine under the flag of denazification. "
    You said that as if it wasn’t true and stopping the ethnic cleansing of the large Russian speaking population wasn’t valid enough reason in itself.
    The other reason was demilitarisation.
    Also a valid reason since NATO expansion right next to them, undoubtably with nukes, is an existential threat.
    Russia gave them plenty of chances to prevent war but they didn’t listen.
    Never intended to honor the Minsk accords, as Merkel admitted, and only used it to buid up their army.
    It was the west that started this with their regime change coup and wanted this to happen.
    A proxy to be used and then thrown away.
    It is their usual MO.

    • dzsimbo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Everything you say could be true. Just like the Ukranian propaganda. More probably there are kernels of truth, blown up on both sides.

      Just from my personal view, I feel a Russian army moving towards Europe gives me more angst than some very problematic Ukranian language laws. I remember the laws being in the news in Hungary waaaay back in the day, maybe even before Maidan, but I wasn’t really paying attention to happenings at the time.

    • Geobloke@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The nukes have been an existential that since the 50s…

      Has Russia even attempted to make a public case for Ukrainians perpetrating genocide at the UN?