• x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wonder if Canadians can read and learn that their own tariffs are causing the same problems for them.

        • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Except Canadian tariffs have, so far, been targeted so as to cause maximum harm to red states and minimum harm to Canadians. Unlike Trump’s sloppy across-the-board approach.

          • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Yes, that and also Trump seems to count on his supporters not understanding who will end up paying for those tariffs by misleading them into believing other countries will pay for those tariffs for them.

            Meanwhile Canadian elected officials have been very upfront about the rough times ahead. But unlike Americans, Canadians are motivated, united and have a strong will to weather the storm.

            The way Trump does it also hurts his own country’s economy even more because he has made it clear that no country is safe from unpredictable tariffs. Investors hate unpredictability. They’ll take their money elsewhere. And on top of that he’s doing it with multiple countries at the same time, which is an even dumber thing to do because the effects of all the countries retaliatory tariffs will be cumulative.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’d do an ad that says: “We don’t pay the tariffs. You do” — Canada

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Which is pretty true. But it’s funny because Canada has tougher tariffs on the US meaning their people pay more for things there for exactly the same reason. Canada charges a 300% tariff on dairy.

      So yeah. Tariffs are bad. Let’s get rid of them entirely.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s not true btw the only thing 300% or more is dairy products classified as other (dehydrated butter, ghee, anything not covered by other negotiations) and it’s only applied when the amount imported is higher than the agreed upon terms of CUSMA

      • dickalan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yeah, that’s only if they make too much. You’re being a jackass on purpose and are probably paid opposition here in the United States. Can it

      • sloppychops@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        The US and Canada both have dairy tariffs in place. However, they functionally do not exist because they are only applied after a quota is met. For example, last year Canada charged a 0% tariff on all US dairy imports because the total volume of trade never breached the quota limit. This has basically been the case since NAFTA.

        Canada, on average, actually charges lower tariffs than the US. That was true before Trump’s trade war and remains true today.

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Canada can also meet most or all of its own dairy needs. There’s no reason a Canadian should be buying dairy from other countries aside from a few niche/luxury products, so that tariff is fine.

        Charging tariffs on things a country needs to import is crazy.

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        So yeah. Tariffs are bad. Let’s get rid of them entirely.

        70 percent of the revenue of US dairy producers comes from government subsidies lol. As a result they overproduce at less than half the real cost, all from your tax dollars. Pretending like everyone dropping tariffs on US dairy would make dairy trade “fair” is asinine.

      • Yoga@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Canada charges a 300% tariff on dairy.

        How much product was tariffed at that rate in 2024?

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      For now, sure. Why would it not be?

      Maybe next week it will be punished by sending someone to a camp.

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Neither does AIPAC

          From there website:

          WE STAND with those who stand with Israel. The AIPAC PAC is a bipartisan, pro-Israel political action committee. It is the largest pro-Israel PAC in America and contributed more resources directly to candidates than any other PAC. 98% of AIPAC-backed candidates won their general election races in 2022.”

          WE ENCOURAGE the U.S. government to enact specific policies that create a strong, enduring and mutually beneficial relationship with our ally Israel.

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    3 days ago

    Let’s see how committed they are to “Free Speech”. Bets on how long until Florida or D.C. bans these ads? (They’ll call it “foreign interference”).

    • bdonvrOPA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      3 days ago

      They’ll call it “foreign interference”

      Honestly it kind of is. Though in this case I’m all for it.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      The First Amendment is gone.

      Trump is openly retaliating against people who criticized him. Our constitution isn’t worth the crumbling paper it’s written on any more.

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        It never was, ignoring how it enshrined slavery, the system it built relied on people acting in good faith. The idea that elected officials would always work to preserve democracy.

        Now it’s evident that is not an appropriate system for checks and balances.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          It has good parts and had a lot of bad parts. It was written centuries ago, so let’s take that framing into consideration. It was a worthwhile endeavor to pursue the good parts while amending the bad, directly or via modern courts. Unfortunately it’s been a backsliding battle against conservatives who selectively interpret it as “originalists”, like they selectively interpret their bible to enhance their power and pocketbook and ignore the parts that are inconvenient or get between them and money, and obstinately refuse change or would actively change it for the worse.

          The most ironic part is that the countries that the US fought with in WW2 that had some absolutely awful leadership and governance were outfitted with relatively excellent frameworks to govern with postwar, Germany and Japan, while the US has been crippled with resting on its laurels and mulish refusal to take the lessons learned those endeavors to heart.

    • tacofox@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      “At Fox News we’d bet our bottom dollar that we’d do anything to increase our bottom dollar”

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I like to imagine that the Murdoch news outlets are exchanging money for other outcomes, like spreading racism and hailing corporate.

  • Jerb322@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ha! I thought op used a highlighter to cover the screen, and one could just see through it.

    But it’s just the design of the machine…

    • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      We need to formulate an ideogram that even Florida man can understand.

      Sounds like lyrics to a Soul Coughing song. Is M. Doughty around here, somewhere?

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 days ago

    How long until they spend more time and effort banning this while yelling about it constantly than ever saying one bad thing about how Russia is infiltrating our country by doing almost the exact same thing.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I didn’t know foreign governments could buy ads in America for political purposes.

    • shawn1122@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s the USA. Everything is for sale. From the wellbeing of your ordinary everyday citizen to the government that supposedly represents.

    • bdonvrOPA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah that’s what made it Mildly Interesting for me. I’ve seen a few tourism ads here and there but never something like this.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    They should be more precise: “Trumps tariffs are a tax on your grocery bill”. Anyone elses would be, too, yes, but no-one else is that stupid.