psychothumbs@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前They Criticized Musk on X. Then Their Reach Collapsed.www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square62linkfedilinkarrow-up1579arrow-down17cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1572arrow-down1external-linkThey Criticized Musk on X. Then Their Reach Collapsed.www.nytimes.compsychothumbs@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前message-square62linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down4·1 个月前What? He went on Trump’s sub and tried to get them to like him by editing their comments… If that’s what you mean. Weird way to phrase it.
minus-squareLka1988@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-21 个月前Still a shitty thing to do. As a site admin for millions of people, that person has an ethical and potentially legal obligation to not touch the internal database. If he did it to those users, who else’s comments did he edit?
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 个月前I’m sorry that you completely missed the point of my comment
minus-squareLka1988@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 个月前No I understood just fine, but that precedent is a far bigger issue than whatever side of the fence you sit on.
What?
He went on Trump’s sub and tried to get them to like him by editing their comments…
If that’s what you mean. Weird way to phrase it.
Still a shitty thing to do. As a site admin for millions of people, that person has an ethical and potentially legal obligation to not touch the internal database.
If he did it to those users, who else’s comments did he edit?
I’m sorry that you completely missed the point of my comment
No I understood just fine, but that precedent is a far bigger issue than whatever side of the fence you sit on.