• bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I don’t think I have ever seen a toilet brush with a lever to eject the brush. I also don’t think it solves much. You’d have to wash your hands anyway.

    • ...m...@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      …say hello to my little friend!..

      (basically a compact dish scrubbie + bleach detergent embedded into each disposable head: never have to touch the business end to load refills from the caddy nor to eject used scrubbies into the trash)

        • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          It’s the difference between a large and a small pathogenic load. It seems as though everyone here believes themselves to be perfect hand washers when they likely are not. You can reduce the chance of an occurrence, but rarely can you completely negate it.

          No, you’d scrub your hands clean after washing the toilet using a toilet brush and gloves because you expect to perform the act many times across your utterly fallible life. Why introduce additional risk and hassle for no benefit? Frankly, obstinately arguing for extra chores, particularly ones involving poop water, doesn’t make sense to me.