Chris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · edit-214 天前The inarguable case for banning social media for teenswww.ft.comexternal-linkmessage-square73linkfedilinkarrow-up183arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up183arrow-down1external-linkThe inarguable case for banning social media for teenswww.ft.comChris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · edit-214 天前message-square73linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMudMan@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up20·14 天前Really? You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? Could have just said what you thought, saved everybody the trouble. That feels a bit patronizing.
minus-squareChris Remington@beehaw.orgOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·14 天前 You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? No. That feels a bit patronizing. That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.
minus-squareThevenin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 天前@remington is all about healthy discussion. He doesn’t mind when people disagree, just as long as they say why.
minus-squareMudMan@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·13 天前Patronizingly cryptic AND with disciples coming in behind him to explain his whole deal. He should watch out for roaming cups of hemlock, just in case.
Really? You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? Could have just said what you thought, saved everybody the trouble. That feels a bit patronizing.
No.
That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.
@remington is all about healthy discussion. He doesn’t mind when people disagree, just as long as they say why.
Patronizingly cryptic AND with disciples coming in behind him to explain his whole deal.
He should watch out for roaming cups of hemlock, just in case.