OTTAWA — OTTAWA - Elections Canada says more than 68 per cent of eligible voters cast a ballot in the federal election – more than 19.5 million people.

While this election was widely expected to see increased turnout, it did not surpass the record set in March 1958, when 79.4 per cent of eligible Canadians voted.

But the nearly 68.7 per cent turnout was the best since the 1993 federal election, which saw 69.6 per cent of eligible voters cast a ballot.

Elections Canada says early estimates indicate 11 million people voted at their polling station or in their long-term care facility on election day.

The agency says nearly 7.3 million Canadians voted at advance polls while 1.2 million voted by special ballot.

Elections Canada does not gather demographics data so it’s not clear which groups turned out to vote, but it says postelection surveys can show which groups faced barriers to voting and what can be done to address them in future elections.

The Liberal party ended the election with 43.7 per cent of the total vote and 169 seats, while the Conservative party secured 41.3 per cent of the vote and 144 seats.

The Bloc Quebecois and the NDP both took 6.3 per cent of the vote, and will hold 22 and seven seats, respectively.

  • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    40 minutes ago

    Would have been 2 more if Elections Canada did not fumble sending us the out of country voting package. Sure there are many others in the same boat.

  • bowreality@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Canadians apparently don’t realize how much of a privilege it is to be able to vote. Surprises me every time.

  • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The Bloc Quebecois and the NDP both took 6.3 per cent of the vote, and will hold 22 and seven seats, respectively.

    Our electoral system is fundamentally misrepresentative by design. We desperately need proportional representation.

  • Dearche@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    These numbers are really encouraging. Voter participation has been a serious issue on all levels of government for a long time, and hopefully this is the beginning of a reverse in trends. Canadians need to at least pay a minimum of attention to what their leaders are doing or else they’ll just do whatever they think they can get away with.

    So many Canadian leaders sneak in absurd laws and policies and Canadians just don’t notice or say anything, and I say this in regards to all parties. Not saying anything, especially during elections, is a tacit approval. Because showing disapproval is the only way to make governments know that they can’t get away with ignoring the public good in favour of personal agendas.

    • Thepotholeman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Fuck dude Canadians dont even know what provincial governments do. They get mad at: the carbon tax, healthcare, infrastructure, education, and housing yet at every turn that’s on the province to fund and manage. The federal government chips in to help of course but the province MANAGES it at the end of the day. And before anybody says “the carbon tax was Trudeau Though!”, I’m sorry, but the carbon tax was only a federal MINIMUM if your province didn’t have a system in place already. Or when they got rid of any other pricing system like Ontario did, Alberta did and Saskatchewan did and then got all pissy when they had to pay it and not a single fucking moron in those provinces hated on the premiers for it.

      Canadians can be just as fucking dumb as Americans and it was really showing these last 5 years

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I wish the turnout was higher, but I get it. Before voting I checked on how close the race in my riding was. It wasn’t. The Conservative candidate was projected to win a landslide victory with 99% confidence. I regret looking because it made me not even want to go out and vote. I did anyways thinking maybe there’ll be way more voters than normal this year. There wasn’t. The Conservative candidate won a landslide victory. Just like last election, and the one before that, and the one before that. I wasn’t even born yet the last time this riding wasn’t held by a Conservative. FPTP voting sucks.

    • StopTouchingYourPhone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I regret looking because it made me not even want to go out and vote.

      This is the main reason I think poll prediction media should be banned during elections. People can change things by voting, but you’d never know it from the election “advice” plastered everywhere. I believe it promotes an apathy vote where people just stay home more than anything informative or otherwise useful.

      ty for going anyway.

    • dxdydz@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Our riding was projected 99% Conservative win but we went NDP. The riding specific forecasts are misleading, and I wonder how many important votes stayed home because they looked at the forecast and thought it was pointless.

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      My city is a giant retirement community pretending to be a city, so naturally a Conservative always wins. Didn’t stop me from voting anyway, because fuck 'em. Hopefully things change when the retirees biff it.

    • PsychoNaut@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      If the parties don’t see even marginal gains in a region they won’t bother putting resources towards increasing that growth and eventually flipping a seat.

      If we ever get away from first past the post they also need to see that it would benefit them to have second place.

      It’s important to vote regardless of the outcome.

  • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Sad that in the most consequential election in most Canadian’s lifetimes that more than 3 in 10 decided to stay home.

    • m0darn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      FPTP means that many votes have negligible impact, so it’s understandable why some don’t bother.

      • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Probably would not change much with proportional representation. A surprising number of people just don’t care.

  • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Terrible turnout. The worst part is knowing that the % of RW voters was probably 90+ % as usual, with the rest of us lagging way behind.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      carney won by a little over 3.5% PP was still extremely close despite all the tariff and trump dic sucking by pp.

    • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I was watching This hour has 22 minutes and the host asked if a good outcome for the Greens would be more seats than leaders

      • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        The Green party is in shambles, they don’t even know who they are anymore. What the hell are “co-leaders”? It’s basically just a name for Elizabeth May’s independent status.