• Septimaeus@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Upvoted, but also PSA:

    Focusing on CEO salaries establishes a goal that shareholders can easily (and moreover want to) meet, but it’s the shareholders themselves pulling the strings who must be held to account.

    Yes, some CEOs are majority shareholders as well, often those one can name, but they are the exception. Most CEOs are outside hires meant to oversee and take responsibility for a specific agenda (e.g. mergers, layoffs, rebranding initiatives, etc) and the list of CEOs far exceeds that of the actual 0.1% who are toppling democracies and poisoning wells.

    Most importantly, shareholders love it when you blame their CEOs for stuff, because they’re paid for that: to be disposable liability magnets. The golden parachutes are hazard pay, an indication of a job well done. Please do pay more attention to the man behind the curtain.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The outside-hires-CEO model is what led to “locusts” imo: CEOs that prioritize short-term profit (usually layoffs) no matter the long-term costs, so their golden parachute gets bigger, and then moves on.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Second PSA: if you want to find the evil, look at the consulting companies. Shareholders benefit, consulting companies like McKinsey come up with ideas like layoffs or return to office and convince shareholders across the board it will make money

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      But if we dismantle the system of everyone feeding him, then I won’t get the same treatment when I’m no longer temporarily embarrassed after my garage tech bro startup takes off! (This is sarcasm.)

  • errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    If CEOs really were this large it prolly would be justified to pay them more. This dude prolly eats $10,000 food a day