• troed@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    No one needs urinals.

    Case in point: No one has one in their home.

    • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s a bad argument. How many people have hundreds, maybe thousands of people using their toilet every hour? Urinals are made for high traffic areas, where large numbers of men need to pee, and they also save water by not needing to be flushed every time.

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Home bathrooms are single-occupancy, plus most people don’t have the room. They’re definitely beneficial for higher volume places as add much more capacity for less space, and act as an “express lane” of sorts.

    • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ah but the toilet sitters do appreciate how much less urine is on the seats and around the bowl. I would have a urinal in my home if I was to remodel my bathroom. They are convenient.

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can also just sit to pee, so that there’s less urine on the seats and around the bowl. No need for a urinal, which also has splash back.

      • troed@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you splash urine all over the place when peeing you’re sitting wrong.