Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast … as it gets better, we’ll become too dependent.

“all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,”

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I see. So AI for gathering the information to put into the accounting/tax software?

    That’s a more reasonable ask, but I wouldn’t personally trust AI with that. I’ve done something similar in games where I take a picture of something on screen and ask AI to collect all the information from many similar pictures into a table. It’s definitely good enough for gaming, but it makes mistakes often enough I wouldn’t sign my name attesting to the truth of anything it produced, you know?

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Fair point, but i feel like that’s something that’s technologically solvable, and this is dealing only with text, a lot of which is already digital, just in multiple formats, and all easily checkable against the final figures if anyone so desires.

      As a random aside, I saw a clip recently where someone had asked an ‘AI’ model to reproduce a photo with zero changes one hundred times. There were more than zero changes.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Surprisingly, the mistakes ChatGPT made weren’t related to picture processing. Every time I’ve sent a picture, it has flawlessly analyzed the text (even if it’s a screenshot of a massive Linux log or a screenshot with multiple windows / arbitrary text placement). The problems were more like the markdown table I created would not be reproduced perfectly with the new changes/additions. It’s pretty reliable early on, but either as the chat gets longer or the table does, fidelity can be lost. Not very often, but it does happen.

        Just to clarify. But I find as long as you’re paying close attention and can catch mistakes or verify the output, AI does make such tasks much less tedious.