xpostml10@lemmings.world to memes@lemmy.world · 22 hours agoGoogle's WebPlemmy.mlimagemessage-square128linkfedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down121cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imageGoogle's WebPlemmy.mlxpostml10@lemmings.world to memes@lemmy.world · 22 hours agomessage-square128linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-217 hours agoTldr: as we deal with a problem long enough we find more effective ways of dealing with it https://jpegxl.info/ Has some info on what it does https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XL Technically details might be more what you are looking for https://jpegxl.info/resources/jpeg-xl-test-page And a test page, if you don’t see jxl images then you should look at updating your browser
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoSo you have no hard proof (no critic here, I’m just curious)? Not that it’s better but that your test images has the same quality. For the rest, thank you for the links and the time but that only explains how the compression works. If you want to know you could do fourier transform and see which kind of signals are cut out in one for example.
Tldr: as we deal with a problem long enough we find more effective ways of dealing with it
https://jpegxl.info/
Has some info on what it does
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XL
Technically details might be more what you are looking for
https://jpegxl.info/resources/jpeg-xl-test-page
And a test page, if you don’t see jxl images then you should look at updating your browser
So you have no hard proof (no critic here, I’m just curious)? Not that it’s better but that your test images has the same quality.
For the rest, thank you for the links and the time but that only explains how the compression works.
If you want to know you could do fourier transform and see which kind of signals are cut out in one for example.