• Primarily0617@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The cost to construct a new rail connection is significantly higher than the cost to construct a new road connection. Subsidies don’t enter into it.

    If somebody says they have an easy and low cost solution for you, you’d be annoyed if it turned out that it was actually far harder and pricier until maybe 50 years down the line.

    • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The cost to construct a new rail connection is significantly higher than the cost to construct a new road connection.

      Correct. Now compare the cost of maintenance, and then compare the cost of actually moving the items.

      Let’s see which comes out on top when we compare all costs, not just the cost of building.

      • Primarily0617@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        rail lines are also more expensive than roads to maintain

        the cost of moving your items depends entirely on how many items you move—sometimes roads will be cheaper, and sometimes rails will be cheaper

        • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          rail lines are also more expensive than roads to maintain

          That’s because they transport more material than roads.

          The NZ government did a thought experiment where they shifted all rail to road, and the maintenance costs would increase by $105 million.

          Keep in mind the rail system in NZ is underdeveloped.

          Source: https://www.kiwirail.co.nz/assets/Uploads/documents/2021-Value-of-Rail-report.pdf

          If you want to shift the most materials from one place to another at the cheapest rate, you would use rail.

          the cost of moving your items depends entirely on how many items you move—sometimes roads will be cheaper, and sometimes rails will be cheaper

          Do you mean cost to the end consumer or actual expenditure? Are you including CAPEX? What are you actually talking about?

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Maybe consider different framing: If 50 years ago we had budgeted as much public money on public railroads as roads, we’d be in a much better position today and its even more likely this trend will continue.