• alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Arguably that’s worse since she could also be charged with destruction of evidence.

    but like. she wasn’t. she was investigated extensively–and that investigation probably cost her the presidency insofar as any singular thing can be blamed for her loss–and she wasn’t. do you have a reasonable explanation for why she’d not be charged with these things if she was actually as damned as you’re suggesting?

      • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        i’m… sure you recognize that this is quite literally a case where the facts disagree with your personal feelings. i also i don’t really know where we can go from here if your earnest belief is the FBI was “politically motivated” into clearing Hillary Clinton when it literally said her actions did not rise to the standard of criminality and again, their investigation may be the single biggest reasons she lost the presidency.