• EddieTee77@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Very surprised with the results and wanted to get a better understanding if that’s true in real life.

  • random65837@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Any real life evidence of that with those phones going head to head when set up identically with everything accounted for including accounting wfor the battery and screen size differences? Because if not you can’t make that claim.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Is the Cunningham’s law at work? Like newer were you hoping that by posting this as a statement someone would come correct you?

  • EddieTee77@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I am not sure if I am reading this correctly. How can the Pixel 7 Pro have 25% larger battery capacity and be technically worse than the base S23?

    • bluu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      P7Pro has a larger screen at a higher resolution which will consume significantly more power. I’m sure some part of it is also due to inefficiency of the Tensor processor

      • EddieTee77@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        That makes sense. I was just shocked when I was comparing the two online. It seemed wrong which is why I wanted to post and see what others thought

    • random65837@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Even if it did, if it’s for that reason that wouldn’t be an apples to apples comparison.