Say, let’s admit consciousness is the result of a physical process.

Then say this process only goes “forward” when our time coordinate increases. Just like an egg gets cooked when it’s temperature coordinate increases, but it doesn’t get more or less cooked when it’s temperature coordinate decreases.

This would mean that going back in time doesn’t result in any perceptible change, since your consciousness hasn’t evolved from it’s “former” state.

Thus making it possible for us to be travelling through plenty of dimensions in varied directions, only ever experiencing the brief times when you happen to be moving in increasing time. Or whatever combination of movement along varied dimensions makes it possible for you to be conscious.

TLDR: i need to take shorter showers

  • AnDoLiN@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thing is that science cannot prove matter is prior either, yet that is taken as the core assumption that all other assumptions must align to.

    This is the scientific version of Christians saying “god is real, says so in the bible, and because bible was written by god, it must be true”.

    • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Science can’t prove anything. It seeks to build comprehensive models that agree with observations by disproving those that don’t. It is specifically built in a way that uses predictions based on theory and then tests them. This process is used to avoid making useless and unknowable additions. That, and its inherent nature to question everything, is what makes it fundamentally different from religeon. However, it is based on an assumption that the universe makes sense as a physical construct. And that is because there is no other useful starting point. You can try to build a model of the universe based on any gibberish of feelings, but it isn’t useful in any way.

      • AnDoLiN@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You can try to build a model of the universe based on any gibberish of feelings, but it isn’t useful in any way.

        Useful to what end? The very idea that you need to build a model is based on believing in a system that thinks the model is important.

        • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          A model is an understanding of how it works. It allows one to predict how things might react in different general cases, which can be very useful for innovation. You don’t need to try understand things if you don’t want to, but it’s a bit ignorant sounding.

          • AnDoLiN@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            A model is an understanding of how it works.

            “Models work because they help us make better models, and we know better models work because… they’re better models.”