https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00133349.pdf
3 from one poster (rPtND1Si):
And a fourth from a different poster (swam8WIF):
AT&T records were requested for the first poster. Not the second.
The linked article is slop so don’t believe its conclusions.
Bruh,
They redact the IP’s here:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00129293.pdf
And not here:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00129268.pdf
Two IPs:
107.77.223.177
and
172.58.139.162
I was able to find this: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 8/EFTA00023756.pdf
Claiming the user used a dynamic IP and they were not able to track it or identify a user.
Couldn’t the second person have read the first and invented his story? He had like 30min?
Could be.
