Hear me, hear me

There have been requests to improve the posts on this community. I propose these 3 additional rules with soft enforcement, to encourage more meaningful discussions in between the articles, memes, thoughts and OC data sleuthing.

  • #4 when referencing evidence (even if it is mentioned in an article), please post
    • the Bates number of the file you’re referring to
    • a link to the original source
    • a link to a mirror of the file in case DOJ pulls the file.
  • #5 when posting articles, include a few key paragraphs of the article (not the entire article)
  • #6 avoid links to social media as sources. Links to twitter must use xcancel.com.

These 3 rules should improve the quality of content in this community and help us become a safe space to explore more of the files in depth.

Please Vote

I’m really glad to have such great bunch all working towards a common goal, so I would like your input.

Those in favour please upvote this post, while the nays can vote down. Any suggestions/discussion please leave a comment.

I’ll keep votes open for a few days so everyone gets a chance to see this.

  • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    2·
    1 day ago

    okay, but if one makes this a rule, it implies posts not doing it will be removed. i’d rather have them link to xitter or so than not getting to see them at all, which can happen if the OP is too frustrated to repost it with the rules applied