• Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I banned u too btw too bad .world sits in their ass. You forgot to block this account too you’re slipping.

          • Zoot@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Go start your own instance, atleast then you can dictate your own rules and become the very thing you hate. Or you could just be a decent human being and you know, stop stealing content and claiming it as your own.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nobody wants a lawless place. People don’t want a place where there’s an unjustified hierarchy (i.e. reddit admins, and squatting mods). In lemmy you anyone can make their own instance and start comms to replace badly run ones.

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was just banned from News because the mod declared “I don’t understand the basics of arguing”

    I wasn’t even arguing but pointing out a user blatantly spreading misinformation. Apparently the mods are still okay with that staying up.

    Can’t make this shit up people, Lemmy is screwed.

  • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    were you posting ai-generated modified images?

    not all instances, and communities are ok with that. Some are openly hostile to anything ai

    • Beep@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      I did it once as far as I can remember.

      You will see it in my modlog under live image of trump…

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    So what were you doing that preceded the ban? I see a political post in that community, when just a few days ago you posted here complaining that another one got removed: https://lemmus.org/post/21115763

    And I see a bunch of removed comments under that removed post. I can’t read any of them, so you tell us, what were you so innocently doing?

    • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      They remove artist credits from all comics they post, spam like crazy, and have a really weird snotty attitude about it. Idk what else they do but that’s enough for me.

    • Beep@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      3 days ago

      Guilty till proven innocent?

      You can check the actual modlog.

      I didn’t do anything abnormal. Why did the mod ban me is not something I can tell.

  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They did a “ban and remove”, so the logs don’t show what was removed.

    With that being said, a scroll through your profile show a great many comments removed.

    I don’t think PTB, but I can’t prove that.

  • jefferyjefferson@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I highly recommend starting or joining instances that support freedom of speech.

    We can make sections of the fediverse that aren’t just hug boxes for people with an agenda.

    • Luminous5481 "Lawless Heathen" [they/them]@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      anarchists do have rules, they just don’t have hierarchies. the idea that anarchism is a free-for-all, do whatever you want ideology is capitalist propaganda. in a society built on the liberation of all people, you obviously need rules to protect the people from threats that would subjugate or harm them. in real world anarchist collectives, those rules are usually collectively arranged by the people, and in cases where people break those rules, they are adjudicated by groups of people elected or randomly chosen to work out who is in the wrong, and what punishment is suitable for them. yes, anarchists do have what most liberals would call a system of law and order.

      for a good example of how anarchism works in practice, read up on the Zapatista. while they don’t refer to themselves as anarchist, their day-to-day praxis is pretty anarcho-communist.

      • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        anarchists do have rules, they just don’t have hierarchies. the idea that anarchism is a free-for-all, do whatever you want ideology is capitalist propaganda.

        there are many “anarchisms” and some actually refuse rules.

        some are clearly antisocial and nihilistic. That doesn’t make it less anarchist.

        • Luminous5481 "Lawless Heathen" [they/them]@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sure, people like ancaps exist. And there’s naturally no authority on what anarchism is. But you won’t find many leftists, anarchists or otherwise, who will associate themselves with people like that.

          You can scream to the heavens that you’re an anarchist all you want, but you can’t make people accept that or humor you by also calling you one.

          • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You can scream to the heavens that you’re an anarchist all you want, but you can’t make people accept that or humor you by also calling you one.

            that’s a strange occupation, to care about people calling you anarchist or not.

            i know that nowadays people are more interested in what they’re called, appropriated identities, labels and what not, but you really think that those unfrequentables will care about what you call them?

      • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Rules for thee not for me apparently. I was just banned from News because I was pointing out a user spreading misinformation. The mods are fine with the misinformation.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Which news? Which mods? Just post in YPTB is you’re upset about it, why are you replying to me?

          • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I was agreeing with you about the anarchy having rules. I just realized ur a mod so there might be an implication or something but I was just agreeing and had an example.

    • username_1@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Nobody even said that those rules are more adequate :)

      But still, most Lemmy communities have much fewer rules, so overall it is more comfortable here moderation-wise.

          • tomi000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            I know this might sound crazy to you but some people have lives outside of the internet and dont answer every comment after an hour.

          • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Willing to bet it was either the one where you posted a non-shitpost news article, or the one where you posted untagged NSFW, although it could also be neither since you seem to have comments and posts from there that don’t appear in the log, so it could’ve been rule 1. I wouldn’t put it past you since the way you’ve been behaving in the thread and the fact this isn’t your rodeo here indicates you’ve caused a lot of trouble there.

            @Decoy321@lemmy.world Here’s a tip for future trouble makers on Lemmy, you shouldn’t ban with content removal since it excludes content from the modlog and therefore removes context which show why people were banned.

  • TheObviousSolution@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Vague ban messages mean modlog is almost as useless as reddit. Modlog isn’t even useful at checking out your claims. Your attitude is defensive and agitated, but so would that of anyone posting here. Most comments just defend the status quo, or criticize you because of your attitude while not even minding theirs.

    It is impossible to make an objective claim about your case, it’s all “probably”, except that one example from a previous post you made here where someone thinks they’ve gotcha’d when they refer to a previous instance where you’ve shitposted an edited image of negotiations with Iran that basically substitutes the Ayatollah’s face with Trump’s - a very shitposty thing to do.

    • QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Vague ban messages mean modlog is almost as useless as reddit.

      worth noting that anonymous moderators is enabled by default too :/

      • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        There’s no way to disable that it’s not just enabled by default as far as I know, well as a mod anyways. It’s an issue to push on lemmy/piefed devs but they seem to want this system as is.

  • insurrection@mstdn.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    fortunately, the fediverse has absolutely no safeguards against a sybil attack, so you can just make a new identity and ban evade.

    • Beep@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nah, I didn’t come from Reddit to run around the same.

  • MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am ashamed to admit - I haven’t worked at all.

    I’m so sorry, I didn’t realize we were supposed to be working! (Also, I am a ditch digger by trade, and alas, I see no way that my skills could be of service…)

  • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Everyone here seems to ignore the facts that

    • the reason given was “breaks community rules”, but the community doesn’t have rules and
    • it was explicitly a shitpost community.

    Maybe the mod was just accidentally writing “community” instead of “instance”. (I didn’t check what the offending content was.)

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Except it does have rules and lists them in the sidebar, it is not a lawless community and they aren’t trying to make one:

      OP likely broke these rules. Either posting non-shitpost content, like news or politics, or untagged NSFW. We won’t know which one if either of those is the reason the mod banned OP, and I wouldn’t blame that mod for not wanting to respond here since this community tends to have a habit of harassing moderators.

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’re definitely listed as community rules. Here’s a screenshot of the community page in Lemmy-UI:

          They aren’t exactly the same as lemmy.world Terms of service though it makes sense they would share similarities.