Lol if you think the beginning of any of those began when you started hearing about them or they wrote in books about the very beginning of any class revolution. They all likely began with “the casting of the first stone” ww1 began over one Archdukes assassination by a guy.
That first sentence you wrote is so poorly worded that I’m not gonna make assumptions about what you’re even talking about.
WW1 literally didn’t start from the archdukes assassination. The assassination was used as a means to fuel already existing European expansion.
Holy shit, you actually used like the most cliche event a historian would point to as an example of how horribly simplified pre college history classes teach WW1.
It also has nothing to do with the potential of revolution in the working class. It’s quite literally the opposite. The assassination of the archduke was used as a means to fuel European expansion. Which, stay with me here, is the opposite of what I’m talking about as “the propaganda of the deed”. This phrase is specifically about an act (often violence) done by an individual in hopes it would fuel the working class to rise up to overthrow the ruling class.
The ruling class can absolutely use propaganda related to an assassination to fuel their interest. Why? Because they are already the ruling class. They have the power of the state. They command the military. They have the ear of the masses.
You have no idea what you’re talking about and you are talking about WW1 like you googled “what conflict was started from an assassination” and then read the first part of the AI response.
I will apologize though. See, when I read something that I’ve never heard before, especially when it’s a phrase placed in quotes, I take a second to read about what it means before responding to someone. I’m dumb I guess. I assume that other people actually care about understanding something before they respond to it. So I should have typed out the entire explanation of the phrase for you.
If you had just searched “propaganda of the deed” you could have saved yourself from responding with a comment that makes you sound extremely ignorant.
Lol if you think the beginning of any of those began when you started hearing about them or they wrote in books about the very beginning of any class revolution. They all likely began with “the casting of the first stone” ww1 began over one Archdukes assassination by a guy.
That first sentence you wrote is so poorly worded that I’m not gonna make assumptions about what you’re even talking about.
WW1 literally didn’t start from the archdukes assassination. The assassination was used as a means to fuel already existing European expansion.
Holy shit, you actually used like the most cliche event a historian would point to as an example of how horribly simplified pre college history classes teach WW1.
It also has nothing to do with the potential of revolution in the working class. It’s quite literally the opposite. The assassination of the archduke was used as a means to fuel European expansion. Which, stay with me here, is the opposite of what I’m talking about as “the propaganda of the deed”. This phrase is specifically about an act (often violence) done by an individual in hopes it would fuel the working class to rise up to overthrow the ruling class.
The ruling class can absolutely use propaganda related to an assassination to fuel their interest. Why? Because they are already the ruling class. They have the power of the state. They command the military. They have the ear of the masses.
You have no idea what you’re talking about and you are talking about WW1 like you googled “what conflict was started from an assassination” and then read the first part of the AI response.
I will apologize though. See, when I read something that I’ve never heard before, especially when it’s a phrase placed in quotes, I take a second to read about what it means before responding to someone. I’m dumb I guess. I assume that other people actually care about understanding something before they respond to it. So I should have typed out the entire explanation of the phrase for you.
If you had just searched “propaganda of the deed” you could have saved yourself from responding with a comment that makes you sound extremely ignorant.
That’s a lot of words to say “I’m a dumb-ass”
That’s a lot of words for you to say nothing at all.