- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
I found that the SerenityOS project also has a web browser with a completely new set of engines. It looks reasonably capable too.
Both LibWeb and LibJS are novel engines. I have a personal history with the Qt and WebKit projects, so there’s some inspiration from them throughout, but all the code is new. Not to mention, hundreds of people have worked on the codebase since I started it, all adding their own personal influences, so it’s definitely its own thing.
Edit: Here’s a recent interview with the creator Andreas Kling talking to Eric Meyer and Brian Kardell about the browser https://www.igalia.com/chats/ladybird
Edit 2: Here’s their August 2023 update video of the browser https://youtu.be/OEsRW3UFjA0
Edit 3: Looks like the project was recently sponsored $100k USD from Shopify https://awesomekling.substack.com/p/welcoming-shopify-as-a-ladybird-sponsor
It’s quite impressive!
Note: I don’t know anything about the politics of the SerenityOS project or the people behind it.
You must log in or register to comment.
Dang, I remember seeing this many years ago when it was still at like 1998-browser levels of functionality, really cool to see how much progress they’ve made! It’d be awesome to have more non-commercial browser engines out there.
I really love the serenity os project as well honestly, glad it’s not just me who likes that old style of UI (though I’m sad they seem to have dropped the classic Mac style universal menubar…)
SerenityOS and Ladybird are extremely impressive. Andreas comes across as very likeable and the community he’s built seems cool.
There’s a pervasive idea in the programmer community that it’s impossible to make a modern web browser unless you’re a top 10 tech corporation. I love that they’re challenging that and showing that all it takes is a handful of volunteers with good programming chops and a bunch of elbow grease.
A worrying number of people in engineering don’t seem to think software is worthwhile unless you can expect to compete for majority market share with the incumbents. If “hacker” is to be taken as a title of honour, I think it belongs to the ones who make things without expecting to take over the world.
And the project has seemingly helped Andreas stay sober, which is pretty heartwarming.
There’s a pervasive idea in the programmer community that it’s impossible to make a modern web browser unless you’re a top 10 tech corporation.
A worrying number of people in engineering don’t seem to think software is worthwhile unless you can expect to compete for majority market share with the incumbents. If “hacker” is to be taken as a title of honour, I think it belongs to the ones who make things without expecting to take over the world.
agreed, I wish hacker culture was more like this instead of the capitalism fan club it actually is
there’s a weird parallel between large software projects like web browser engines being considered impossible to accomplish without a gigantic corporation’s backing and the long-standing (but utterly false) belief that it’s impossible to do semiconductor manufacturing without a gigantic, expensive factory. the motivation for pushing these claims seems fairly obvious — if folks think these core pieces of tech infrastructure can’t be replicated without corporate control, they just won’t try.
I’ve never thought about it from this perspective. I wonder whose voices I’d find if I put on my tinfoil hat and do some digging on the impossible narrative.
Here’s a thread on the orange site about the project from 5 months back with plenty of opinions™ on the matter: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35521704
Edit: there are many threads https://hn.algolia.com/?q=ladybird
also updated the OP with a link to the news that Shopify recently donated 100k to the project
There’s a vast difference between a page being degraded by all browsers in a consistent manner per W3C specs (especially the critical parts of a webpage such as JS execution or malformed HTML) vs the damn thing breaking in such a unique way that the web devs will never be able to fix the page for this new browser while getting it to work the same for others. Worst case would be security is compromised and that is a very long list of things to implement in both the HTTP layer and browser behavior before you even get started trying to render a page.
it’s kinda amazing how fast the comments started getting fractally wrong as the orange site scrambled to justify why it’s too mediocre to do this work (clearly it’s the fault of the work)
I couldn’t read much further past that one, so much “but, actually” dick waving
I made a vid of it loading awful.systems https://peertube.io/w/buMQfhKiYcCm18evK3n6z1
that’s surprisingly close to perfect already, at least to my eye! and the bug with CSS not wanting to load initially is something I’ve seen safari and Firefox do too
by the way, how was the experience of uploading this to peertube? I’ve been meaning to check them out, and I’m really surprised at how quick and smooth watching that video was on my phone
It was easy but I only have a 5mb daily upload quota with peertube.io - not sure if that can be increased somehow. Otherwise it uploaded and transcoded all within a couple of minutes
huh, that’s interesting. I know bandwidth and storage costs are a big difficulty in hosting a peertube instance (and this is also a reason why an awful.systems peertube isn’t on the table, unless we somehow get frankly suspicious amounts of money for infra). I should make an account there and fiddle with it — maybe they allocate more quota to older or more popular accounts?
