- cross-posted to:
- world@quokk.au
- cross-posted to:
- world@quokk.au
Polish police have detained 123 people and seized more than 330,000 files containing child sexual abuse material in a nationwide operation targeting online child exploitation, authorities said on Thursday.
You must log in or # to comment.
An example of how You should deal with pedophiles, instead of, You know…
Police said some of the seized material included content generated using artificial intelligence, such as images styled on Japanese comics.
Not defending anyone, especially the PoS’ mentioned in the article, but… It looks like it takes one badly worded sentence written by prosecutor to jail someone for hentai…? Imagine police finding such things during an unrelated device search (you wrote some bad things about a political figure).
I don’t get Your point? Are You saying that there can’t be hentai CP?
How does that work though? Hentai is drawn images and while absolutely disgusting, what child was harmed?
I’m disappointed if this is just some cartoon shit. I thought they were getting actual child abusers
Edit: ah some of the images were. So yes actual CP was also contained so fuck this dude.
So if they are only drawings, why not draw adults?
Well your comment was a question so…
I guess you’re implying by the question that there is Hentai CP? Idk. When I think of child abuse I think about actual children being abused not some fantasy images that sick fucks come up with.
I have to partially agree with You. Hentai CP isn’t hurting children, but it still can be considered CP. It would normalise CP for the person watching it. It is a reason to keep an eye on that person. You can’t draw a line between what’s art and what’s acceptable.
There’s the idea that it makes abusing actual children more likely, but I wonder about that. Does rape porn make a person more likely to commit a rape? Do shooting games promote gun violence?
There’s also the idea that drawn images which don’t relate to real-world child abuse can offer therapeutic outlets for non-offending people suffering from pedophilia. Such material might make it less likely for children to be abused.
I think there’s value in us asking and discussing the question, but that experts with proper scientific data are needed for an answer.
If it turned out to be harmless, but also not beneficial in protecting children, should it still be allowed? I know I’d feel better if most sites refused to host that kind of thing, but I can’t really justify that stance in a logical way. I feel like the people who draw it and look at it must be bad people, but I think that’s probably also what some people must think of some of the shit I fap to.
I’m also fairly certain no image generator is capable of producing CP without having been trained on it, so AI images are ultimately the result of actual child abuse. The machines can’t just guess what things look like the way we can. Look into the “full wine glass” story for a demonstration of what I mean.
Well, that would depend?
I can take 30 seconds to draw two little stick figures doing something nasty. Now I tell you that the stick figures are underaged.
Is that really child porn?
Edit: to be clear, I’m not trolling, it’s a serious question. I honestly have great doubts with people calling drawings child porn.
As with many things, it can’t be clearly defined. A stick figure is just a stick figure but I’m pretty sure, You could create some unsettling scenarios using only stick figures. And what about AI generated? No children were hurt there also. But they do reinforce predatory behaviour. What about generating AI porn of someone without their consent? Those are also just drawings, but I think we can agree, that’s a crime.
Edit: I don’t think hentai CP should land someone in prison but it is a reason to keep an eye on them.
Ah yes, the “I know it when I see it” definition.
But you’re right, I’m not sure where to draw the line either.
