That doesn’t make much difference since masturbation is always 100% gay.
You’re touching a dick 100% of the time. Nothing could possibly be more gay.
Welcome to !shitposting@lemmy.today - a place for memes, shitposts, absurdity, cursed images, low-effort masterpieces
This is not the appropriate venue for Nobel-worthy theses.
Futagora’s theorem
I think you looped around on what makes the porn gay.
First two examples gayness is determined by the participants gender. In the third example gayness is determined by the sexuality of the participants.
If we have to observe both sexuality and gender of the participants, then I’d put forward that in futa the woman without a dick is lesbian to some extent. Thus driving up the gayness of futa. How much? IDK Let’s put the penis wielding girl at half gayness, and the girl with the female genitals at 2/3 gayness, that brings the total to 58% gayness.
Frankly the only way to drive gayness down is to either not consider the sexualities or skew the men:women ratio.
Given the constraints put forth in the shitpost, only reverse gangbangs, in which the girls do nothing with each other, are less gay than straight one-on-one porn.
Or you could just go with the flow, and if it turns you on then make sure you’re alone before proceeding.
Frankly the only way to drive gayness down is to either not consider the sexualities or skew the men:women ratio.
The more participants of one gender you have, the more they engage in gay sex. So, for example, adding more women to one man makes it more gay again.
This reminds me of a post I saw stating that crossdressing as a woman is the manliest thing you can do, since by definition it’s not crossdressing if you’re not a man.
You’re assuming the person consuming this is a cis guy, right? But if I look at trans girl porn it’s actually 100% gay because I’m also a trans girl
Just make everything bi so it’s balanced
Indisputable logic
