• BreakingBigfoot@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Big deal! The gaming industry is properly cooked at this point anyway; all these companies only have themselves to blame, and I, for one, am happy to see all that abuse of power backfire in the publishers’ faces. screwing both developers and customers like this for the past 15+ years was never going to sustain the console business.

  • BigMacHole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is OK to Do because it’s AIs fault it Happened and in NO WAY can the People in CHARGE of the AI be Held accountable!

    -OpenAI Lawyers!

    • boonhet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why would they be held accountable? They didn’t prompt the AI… This time (the cyberattacks are a different story and likely were launched by OpenAIs own employees).

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Which is correct.

      GCC is not responsible for compiling malicious code. Going the opposite direction is no different.

      There will never be a chatbot that’s smart enough to be useful but only for good things.

      Also: this use case is a good thing.

  • Rugnjr@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Prediction: companies will rage against this, learn nothing, still not release the beloved old classics to places where people can play them.

    Then after like three years, one company will do a browser port of a classic well, have wild success, then all the others will slop out versions of their own classics with poor quality control and wonder where all the money went.

    Same as it ever was