• Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What part of Matrix is proprietary? It’s not an app, instead, it’s an open protocol that can be used by anyone to build a messaging app or host a server.

    • kpw@kbin.social
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Matrix isn’t proprietary, but effectively controlled by a single VC funded startup. We don’t need a bloated re-invention of existing internet standards anyways. They should just make a better XMPP client.

        • kpw@kbin.social
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but compatibility with existing internet standards is also important. For example you can’t have end-to-end encryption if you use a non-standard protocol. VC startups like Matrix only increase fragmentation of the ecosystem.

            • kpw@kbin.social
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The organization is called the IETF. The XMPP core is defined in RFC 6120 and RFC 6121 like DNS, HTTP, etc. are defined in RFCs.

              • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                TIL that XMPP is defined in an RFC. You’re correct, I wasn’t aware of that. I really don’t understand why the IETF take such a decision though. I don’t know why these guys are defining high-level protocols for things like messaging at all.

                But back to your earlier points:

                For example you can’t have end-to-end encryption if you use a non-standard protocol

                This doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. Matrix has E2EE while using a “non-standard” protocol. So does Signal, in fact, it created the strongest E2EE protocol out there.

                VC startups like Matrix only increase fragmentation of the ecosystem

                Every new project that is created increases fragmentation. So does Revolt, Discord, Skype, WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, etc. These all use “non-standard” protocols.

                Also, the author of RFC 6120 is a Cisco employee, how is a multinational corporation better than a VC-funded startup? XMPP is an open standard, just like the Matrix protocol. It doesn’t matter who created it.

                • kpw@kbin.social
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There are lots of high-level standards for communication. You might have heard of email, its protocols are also defined by the IETF. For instant messaging it is XMPP.

                  This doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. Matrix has E2EE while using a “non-standard” protocol.

                  You can only encrypt messages when the recipient happens to be a Matrix user too. If they use another protocol it’s not possible. That’s why we need standards and that’s why building on existing internet standards is important as opposed to everyone cooking up their own IM protocol like Matrix does.

                  Every new project that is created increases fragmentation. So does Revolt, Discord, Skype, WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, etc. These all use “non-standard” protocols.

                  Yes, they all increase fragmentation as they do not interoperate with one another. A standard would solve this problem.

                  Lot’s of standards are written by people who work at large corporations. Also multiple experts from multiple corporations work together. Wasn’t the original author of the XMPP protocol was hired after the fact by Cisco, precisely because he wrote XMPP and the first server implementation?

                  The IETF still has a much better track record than any single corporation or VC funded start-up.

                  • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Matrix and XMPP are in progress to support MLS, which is now accepted as an Internet standard for E2EE.

                    So encrypted messaging between chat protocols would be possible… Someday.