• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    It is a major turnaround for Musk, who previously said he wouldn’t let Jones back on the platform despite repeated calls to do so. Last year, Musk pointed to the death of his first-born child and tweeted, “I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for gain, politics or fame.”

    Thankfully for him, his sycophants have the memories of goldfish.

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Musk pointed to the death of his first-born child

      He lied about his first-born dying in his arms, to win an internet argument:

      Elon Musk’s ex-wife refutes his claim that firstborn child died in his arms … ‘And not that it matters to anyone except me, because it is one of the most sacred and defining moments of my life, but I was the one who was holding him’

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/justine-musk-elon-musk-dying-son-b2234938.html

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s easy, considering his knobgobblers are the same sort of people who make up shit to forgive Trump for everything possible. They just have to tell themselves “well Alex Jones didn’t do that, he was framed by LIBRULS”

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      “…I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children…”

      Apparently he has mercy for such people now.

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I remember some people saying, “nah, you don’t see it from his perspective, if your son’s life was in trouble and you owned the platform, you’d do the same thing”

        I kinda hate that logic because it assumes I’d say the stupid shit enough to put myself into that situation. Not to mention his family’s life wasn’t actually in danger.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Several people posted proof of him lying about that also, but even if he wasn’t, the only thing that changed was he got a full helping of how “free speech absolutism” personally affects him, and maybe that it’s not such a great idea?